LCRO 21-2017 AJ v AK [pdf, 298 KB]
...these orders. 1 PC v YP [2012] NZFC 3538. 2 At [90]–[100]. I infer that the word missing from [100] in the judgment is “use”. Mr AK had resided in one of the couple’s properties with his parents, post-separation and his former partner sought an adjustment in her favour for occupation rent. 3 At [109]. 3 [11] The parties agreed that Mr AJ would act in the conveyancing necessary to give effect to the orders for sale. He...