[2018] NZEnvC 221 Giles v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.8 MB]
...houses on each site exist, and the oonditions proposed will ensure no additional houses are constructed. The proposed cot.1dltions are attaohed as B. The Issues [4] This case Is a clear example of a non-complying activity where assertion is made through AEE that there are no additional effects on the environment by granting the SUbdivision. The overall conclusion of Mr D Wren, the planner providing the further AEE, is that, subject to the mitigation proposed In the letter, the propo...