VL v SB LCRO 142/2014 & 160/2014 (12 October 2015) [pdf, 77 KB]
...properties (although most seem directed at the sale of one of the blocks referred to as the [X Road] property). They were: (a) The properties were not marketed properly. (b) Mr VL failed to use reasonable efforts to get the best price (including through his GST treatment of the transaction). (c) One purchaser was preferred over another potential purchaser to the cost of the estates. (d) The beneficiaries were misled about a supposed “option” that the successful purchaser h...