RA v LZ LCRO 2 / 2011 (22 August 2012) [pdf, 182 KB]
...correspondence wherein the Practitioner had referred to an ‘agreement’ between Mr RD and Mr RA, and later referred to Mr RD’s withdrawal of his ‘offer’ which Mr RA took as implying there was no agreement.) [30] The Practitioner (through counsel) strongly protested that there had not been any prior allegation of deceit, and objection was made to a new complaint being raised at the review. The Practitioner was entitled to take this view, because no part of Mr RA compla...