Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000206 Cato Bolam Consultants Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...to be heard in support of my submission: Yes If others make a similar submission, I will consider presenting a Joint case with them at a hearing: Yes Telephone: 0274 933022 If you are a person who could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 I could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission :#b07-3 Astrid Cald...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 217 Humphreys v Humphreys and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...Humphreys is a 33-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with Angelman syndrome when she was three years old. She has been assessed as having very high disability needs. Those very high disability needs have been with her since birth and will continue throughout her life. Sian does not have capacity to understand these proceedings or to participate in them, other than through a litigation guardian. [2] Sian’s lifelong disability needs mean that she cannot be left unsupervise...

3. Brightwell - Estate of Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1457 [pdf, 607 KB]

   ...the applicant’s prior applications and refer to individual documents from those prior applications as required. Concise history of Order sought to be amended/cancelled 6. The application is complex in nature and involves several applications through the then Native Appellate Court and Native Land Court in the early 1900s. 7. The applicant has complained of three individual orders: 1. 10 Taranaki MB 138 – 156 (12 & 13 October 1906); 2. 10 Taranaki MB 174 – 177 (29 Octobe...

4. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...speak out in critique of the court or the judiciary with the possibility of a jail sentence.20 Issues in the Family Court for the Review Panel to consider Context Many women have told Backbone that they first approached the Family Court after separating from an abuser, seeking protection and safety, but most said they subsequently wished they had never done so. Women told Backbone the Family Court put them and their children in more danger after leaving an abusive and violent...

5. Coutts - Estate of James Pou (2008) 129 Whangarei MB 145 (129 WH 145) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...uncle raised him. He just. .. Court: I see. So, this is a whangai child of your uncle? 129 Whangarei MB 148 SMonk: Yes, he was just left behind and my uncle looked after him. Court: He raised him from what age? S Monk: About 3. Court: Right through his childhood? S Monk: Oh, off and on because between my uncle and his wife they both took care of him. They were both separated . R Potorata: ... and he'd go back to his ... Court: Did the mother of Trez ... ? R Potomta:...

6. NZCVS Core Report Cycle 2 (2019) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...and economic deprivation around where many Māori live, makes it more likely that they will be a victim of crime. Adults who were never married or in a civil union (36%) were significantly more likely to experience crime. Adults living in sole-parent households (37%) were significantly more likely to experience crime while adults living in couple-only households (26%) were significantly less likely to experience crime When factors such as age were considered, disabled adults were...

7. Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation - Matauri X Incorporation (2007) 120 Whangarei MB 52 (120 WH 52) [pdf, 9.4 MB]

   ...happen. Nevertheless, I understand from Mr Samuels that it was the view of his step-father that part of the land should be amalgamated and it seems that his view prevailed in the domestic deliberations. The 10 acres at Putataua Bay was to be held separately by Mr Samuels' step-father and mother. Consequently, a further partition was necessary, giving rise to Matauri IH8Al (the 10 acres) and Matauri 1H8A2 (the 7 acres 3 roods and 13 perches). [15] On 7 July 1966 the Court made...

8. Vikashwarjeet v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 6 (30 January 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...respond before a decision to uphold or dismiss the complaint is made. Discussion The facts [8] The material allegations in the complaint appear to be: [8.1] The complainants approached the adviser to assist with seeking a visitor’s visa for the parents of one of the complainants. [8.2] At the initial meeting, the complainants explained to the adviser that there was a potential issue in that one of the persons seeking a visa had previously had a visa revoked due to a character i...

9. Trustees of the Horina Nepia and Te Hiwi Piahana Whanau Trust v Ngati Tukorehe Tribal Committee & Tahamata Incorporation (2014) 314 Aotea MB 159 (314 AOT 159) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...Aotea MB 12-13 (50 AOT 12-13) 314 Aotea MB 163 [7] The Incorporation and NTTC reject the claims and argue that Paora Te Hiwi intended that the shares were to be transferred for the benefit of the hapū and marae that Mr Te Hiwi affiliated to through the tribal entities located at Ohau. They say that while the transfer form refers to “Tukorehe Pa, Ohau” the share register and related records disclose that the shares were transferred to the trustees of Ohau Pā Reserve....

10. Hipango v Ngaurukehu Section 3 and Other Blocks Inc. - Rangiwaea 4F14A2C (2023) 473 Aotea MB 25 (473 AOT 25) [pdf, 465 KB]

    ...could only be transferred to another shareholder, the incorporation, the Māori Trustee, a state loan department or the Crown. There was also the ability to transfer shares to the shareholder’s spouse, child or remoter issue, brother, sister, parent, brother or sister of a parent, or to the child or remoter issue of a parent or of the brother or sister. Part 13 Māori Incorporations [31] For current purposes, a significant change to the pre-1993 regime was that shares in a Māo...