CAC402 v Dunham [2016] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 248 KB]
...neighbouring property to 42 Forrester Drive (“the property”), and that this would affect the property’s views; [b] The second charge alleges that the defendant failed to disclose, at the relevant time, that the vendors of the property were her parents. 2 [3] The defendant denies the charges. She asserts that she pointed out the proposed building work at the neighbouring property (at 53 Forrester Drive, Tauranga) to the complainants and orally disclosed that the vendo...