LCRO 137/2018 A1 v B2 (26 November 2018) [pdf, 158 KB]
...and Mr JB are K’s parents. They separated and both formed subsequent relationships. Although the Family Court allowed Mr JB unsupervised overnight contact, Ms A1 continued to care for K and Mr JB felt himself excluded. Mr JB challenged Ms A1 through the Family Court, seeking to extend his involvement in K’s upbringing. The Court appointed a lawyer for K. [3] Ms A1, who was represented by lawyers, latterly Ms LL, objected to the involvement of both lawyers, Ms B2 and K’s, a...