Search Results

1. NZCVS topical report Cycle 1 (2018) - Offences against New Zealand adults by family members [pdf, 679 KB]

   ...likely to report offences by an intimate partner (1.7% of females compared with 0.5% of males). • Māori adults (4%) were at more risk of experiencing offences by family members than European adults (2%). • 8% of adults living in a single parent household experienced an offence by a family member in the past 12 months, as had 9% of single adults who had separated from a partner in the past year. • Separation from a partner appears to be a key risk factor for intimate partner...

2. Julia Clements [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...will have on the local neighbourhood. I have lived here for 20 years and I am submitting as a concerned resident. We live in a mixed residential zone and it was specifically designed to have one way in and one way out to prevent traffic passing through the subdivision. Kristin’s proposal significantly alters the nature of the subdivision by allowing private school through traffic. This proposal also does not take into account: • the Council’s proposed zone change on the land...

3. Family violence reform paper 2: Family violence civil law [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...applying for a protection order costly and complex  Police safety orders and protection orders are not always seen as effective at stopping the perpetrator’s use of violence  more can be done to ensure children’s interests are considered and parenting arrangements are safe for adult victims and their children, and  opportunities for government agencies to intervene to stop perpetrators using violence are not maximised, particularly ensuring services are made available at...

4. FV Reform Paper 2 Civil Law [pdf, 558 KB]

   ...applying for a protection order costly and complex  Police safety orders and protection orders are not always seen as effective at stopping the perpetrator’s use of violence  more can be done to ensure children’s interests are considered and parenting arrangements are safe for adult victims and their children, and  opportunities for government agencies to intervene to stop perpetrators using violence are not maximised, particularly ensuring services are made available at...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors - Media Release [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...is led by an Overseeing Shepherd, assisted in his role by a subordinate group of Shepherds and Servants. Over time the leaders have put in place a complex range of organisational and legal structures to support a communal way of living, primarily through a Charitable Trust and a Partnership (Christian Partners). The Community operates a variety of commercial enterprises. Serenity Pilgrim, Pearl Valor, Rose Standtrue, Virginia Courage, Anna Courage and Crystal Loyal (the plaintiffs)...

6. Notice of Appeal - Deportation Appeal by a Resident/Permanent Resident - Form 3 [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...FORM 3 – DEPORTATION APPEAL BY A RESIDENT OR PERMANENT RESIDENT – 24/06/2024 Page 3 of 10 Step 4. Your spouse/partner What is your current relationship status? (You may tick more than one box)  Never married  Married  Engaged  Separated  Widowed  Civil Union  Partnership/De facto  Divorced What is your spouse/partner’s full name and address? (if applicable) Family name / surname First name Middle name You do not need to complete your spo...

7. Foster v Wood - Taupo No.23 B Section 1 (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 43 (108 TTK 43) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...partitioning the Taupo block creating the Taupo 23 block. (c) On 10 March 1914 a further partition was granted creating Taupo 23B. Taupo 23B was vested in 3 owners one of those being Peti Kingi. Peti Kingi was an original owner named in the parent Taupo block. (d) On 10 March 1914 a further partition was granted creating Taupo 23B1. This block was vested in Peti Kingi solely. (e) On 18 July 1921 Peti Kingi sold Taupo 23B1 to Delphine Pepi. (f) Delphine Pepi passed away on 24...

8. LCRO 136/2017 RAI and SEM v EYR, IPA and DYN (26 November 2018) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...applicants had raised and decided further action was not necessary or appropriate, in some cases by a fine margin. Background [3] J, whose conception relied on a donor, was born in 2010. Ms RAI and her now- former partner, Ms JOP, were both named as parents on J’s birth certificate. They both 2 cared for J until she was 2 and continued to share her care after they separated. They worked to an agreed timetable that enabled J to spend equal time with each of them. [4] Bo...

9. Gill v ACC [2015] NZACA 4 [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...years later. The Corporation accepted coverage, not for the illness, but for the consequences of its late diagnosis and treatment. A retrospective claim was then made against the Corporation for “attendant care”, being the care that Ms Gill’s parents had provided to Lisa as a result of her severe handicap. [3] The essential issue for me is whether Lisa’s covered injury (brain damage) required a level of care continuous enough to meet the statutory threshold for attendant car...

10. LCRO 235/2020 JT v PT (6 May 2021) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...speculation as to what K would have done if Mr PT had provided her with the appropriate information, she was nevertheless, deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision as to what steps, if any, she should take. The situation K (and her parents) found themselves in would, without doubt, have caused them considerable stress and anxiety for some time. Mr PT’s conduct, as referred to in LCRO 3/2019, would have contributed to that stress and anxiety. Mitigating factor...