Search Results

1. IncreasingRevenuefromCourtsandTribunalFeesandCollectionsServices.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release: Increasing Revenue from Courts and Tribunal Fees and Collections Services Date of issue: 4 July 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted a

2. Matthews v Matthews - Estate of Graham Ngahina Matthews [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 512 (2015 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...on the collective and the retention principle extends to whānau as a whole and descendants as a whole. Picking a winner amongst five children runs contrary to the principle of retention in the collective. Fragmentation concerns can be addressed through management structures such a trust. (e) The respondents disagree that removing sole ownership of the land interests would prejudicially affect use, management and development of the land. The decision of the Court below to grant a...

3. OIA-96282.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   gen, Section (9 ) (2) (a) Section (9 ) (2 ) (a) Justice Cenlre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nzIwww.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 96186 Tena koe - Official Information Act request: Victim Support Thank you for your email of 24 May 2022, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to Victim Support. I have outlined your specific requests and my response to each below (please

4. [2019] NZEmpC 65 Rayner v Director-General of Health [pdf, 795 KB]

   AMANDA RAYNER v DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH [2019] NZEmpC 65 [27 May 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 65 EMPC 439/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AMANDA RAYNER Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH Defendant EMPC 30/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a

5. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended tracked 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

6. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

7. Ngā Rūnanga - EiC – S McIntyre - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [PDF, 902 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

8. B v ACC [2012] NZACA 5 [pdf, 127 KB]

   [2012] NZACA 5 ACA 16/08 & ACA 281/88 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN MR B of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL

9. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Park [2023] NZLCDT 51 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 327 KB]

   THE NAMES OF THE COMPLAINANT AND HER SISTER, THE FAMILY NAME OF THE CLIENT, MR PARK’S FORMER EMPLOYER AND FIRM NAME, MR PARK’S FELLOW EMPLOYEE WHO ATTENDED THE 22 JUNE MEETING, AND THE NAME OF THE LAWYER WHO PROVIDED AN OPINION OF THE WILL FOR MR PARK’S FIRM SHALL NOT BE PUBLISHED. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZLCDT 51 LCDT 006/23 IN THE MATTER of t

10. Independent Electoral Review Final Report [pdf, 11 MB]

    Final Report Our recommendations for a fairer, clearer, and more accessible electoral system November 2023 He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review This report may be cited as: Independent Electoral Review, 2023. Final Report: Our Recommendations for a Fairer, Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 I