Gill v Singh [2016] NZIACDT 36 (30 June 2016) [pdf, 155 KB]
...Zealand, they are consistent with the claim. Mr Singh promotes himself as an unpaid professional, which is implausible unless accompanied by an explanation. In these circumstances it is consistent with the allegation that he required fees to be paid offshore and colluded with employers to manufacture immigration opportunities. [40] Mr Singh’s answer is that he behaves properly, and that the complainant has simply invented the allegations. He uses the employer to support him, which can...