Search Results

1. Tom De Pelsemaeker - Evidence in Reply (25 June 2021) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA BET...

2. 9. JWS 9 - Objective, Stranded Assets & miscellaneous Minor Matters 4 & 21 June 2021 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...De Pelsemaeker dated 14 March 2021 currently includes one objective as follows: 10A.1.1 Transition toward the long-term sustainable management of freshwater in the Otago region by establishing an interim planning framework to manage (a) water permits for takes and uses of freshwater not previously authorised by a water permit, (b) the replacement of deemed permits, and (c) water permits for takes and uses of freshwater where those water permits expire prior to 31 December 2025,...

3. Fish & Game Updated Supplementary B Farrell Planning 24 March 2021 [pdf, 583 KB]

   ...the Department of Conservation and Otago Regional Council have statutory functions to protect these. Non-regulatory methods can be applied, in the interim, to implement these functions. 9 In order to maintain the status quo, at least for deemed permits, I understand it will be necessary for existing priorities to be rolled over. There is no reason why existing priorities cannot be introduced as matters of control (as imposing conditions of consent would satisfy the requirements of...

4. Tukutau v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 103 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...disbursement of $500, compensation of $2,000 for the general consequences of Ms Tangilanu’s actions, and $2,000 for costs relating to the complaint and remedial action. The complainant also sought that Ms Tangilanu be prevented from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years. Ms Tangilanu [6] Ms Tangilanu provided submissions on sanctions. She did not challenge the orders sought by the complainant. It appears she made a generic response to this and 11 other complai...

5. Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 105 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...disbursement of $1,050, compensation of $2,000 for the general consequences of Ms Tangilanu’s actions, and $2,000 for costs relating to the complaint and remedial action. The complainant also sought that Ms Tangilanu be prevented from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years. Ms Tangilanu [6] Ms Tangilanu provided submissions on sanctions. She did not challenge the orders sought by the complainant. It appears it is intended as a generic response for this and 11 o...

6. CAC 414 v Goyal [2018] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...may impose under s 93 of the Act (these include censuring or reprimanding the licensee, and ordering the licensee to undergo training or education); [b] Impose a fine of up to $15,000; [c] Order cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; Submissions [17] Mr Simpson submitted for the Committee that Mr Goyal’s conduct should be placed at least at the mid-range of misconduct. He submitted that Mr Goyal was “hopelessly conflicted right from the outset”, and tot...

7. [2021] - NZREADT 09 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1905 v Papuni (24 February 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...of penalty, following a finding of misconduct. As relevant to the present case, the Tribunal may: [a] make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may make under s 93 of the Act; [b] order cancellation of the licensee’s licence, or suspension for a period not exceeding 24 months; [c] order an individual licensee to pay a fine of up to $15,000; Submissions [25] Ms Paterson referred us to two Tribunal decisions which involved licensees engaging in dishonest...

8. [2021] NZIACDT 11 - YC v Han (19 May 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...PRELIMINARY [1] Ms Yujuan Janelle Han, the adviser, advised Ms YC, the complainant, who was seeking a work visa. However, Ms Han was not named in the agreement with the client as an adviser who could assist her. At the time, Ms Han held a provisional licence and was supervised by Mr Jiale William Wan. Due to the failure of Ms Han and/or Mr Wan to reply to a letter from Immigration New Zealand, the complainant’s visa application was unsuccessful. [2] A complaint to the Immi...

9. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...services. [1.2] Ms Devi failed to complete the steps required to commence the professional engagement. [1.3] An unlicensed person provided immigration services. [1.4] Ms Devi failed to ensure her client’s interests were represented when her licence was cancelled. [2] Ms Devi denies the grounds of complaint. She has provided explanations of the various aspects of the complaint. The issues are first to decide whether Ms Devi’s explanations, if true, are an adequate justification....

10. [2020] NZIACDT 12 - TSO v Essina (27 February 2020) - Sanctions [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...Tribunal upholding the complaint and will only be briefly summarised here. [4] Ms Essina was at the relevant time a licensed immigration adviser based in Auckland. She was a director of Approved Immigration Ltd (Approved Immigration). Her licence expired on 21 October 2018 and has not been renewed. [5] In addition to her immigration consultancy, Ms Essina operated another business which provided job search and recruiting services. [6] The complainant, a national of India res...