Search Results

1. OIA-125635.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...(pos 2nd OFT) 3rd/sub Land Transport Act 1998 Section 60(1)(b), 60(3) & 72(1)(f) J507 Exceeded 80 Km/H Sh6 At Woodbourne Speed Camera Land Transport Act 1998 Section 133 and Transport Act 1962 Section 52(d) & 193 L231 Drove contrary to limited licence - 3rd or subsequent Land Transport Act 1998 Section 32(1)(b) & 32(4) H161 Third party failed to produce records relating to a RUC vehicle Road User Charges Act 2012 Section 67(5) J513 Exceeded 80 Km/H Sh1 At Silverdale Speed Camera...

2. CAC20003 v Sue [2015] NZREADT 87 [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...significant concern to us and reflects adversely on his fitness to conduct real estate agency work. We agree. [18] Ms Earl submits that conduct of this nature, involving as it does mismanagement of client monies, warrants suspension of the defendant’s licence and, in the particular circumstances of this case, suspension for a period of three months would be appropriate to denounce the conduct involved. She observes that, in contrast to the situation where a licensee works exclusivel...

3. CAC 10007 v Wallace - Penalty Decision [2012] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...similar cases: Aitken v Real Estate Agents Licensing Board HC Christchurch AP 130/96, 6 September 1996 at 12.” 6 [28] The Tribunal was satisfied that the conduct warrants consideration of cancellation or suspension of the defendant’s licence, but took into account the context of the offending, namely a bitter and private matrimonial dispute. Further, the forgeries were not directly connected with his real estate work. The end sentence was one of suspension for 12 months....

4. Kumar v Lepcha [2011] NZIACDT 3 (27 January 2011) [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...Though there is no indication any other licensed immigration adviser was involved in the present matter. [14.2] B & L Associates Ltd and Kingsland had respectively Mr Donald Han, and his wife Mrs Kathy Hou as directors. [14.3] Because he held a licence as an immigration adviser the Adviser was “directed by the director of the company to represent certain student applications”, including one by the Complainant. [14.4] Another marketer named “Naresh” and Mr Han would discuss...

5. Singh v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 22 (7 July 2011) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...things the Adviser would not condone, and should not be responsible for. General comments: [10.14] When the Complainant first lodged her application, offshore advisers could operate without being licensed. [10.15] The Adviser’s New Zealand licence “should not be impeached” on the basis of what was occurring in Fiji. [10.16] The Adviser was not licensed at the time. [10.17] The Adviser would investigate the possibility of the former staff member refunding fees. Decision...

6. Kartikeya v Fernyhough [2014] NZIACDT 79 (09 September 2014) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...complainant and her husband attended the adviser’s office. They had the name of a person working there. The signs at the premises indicated it was the practice of Mr Fernyhough, a licensed immigration adviser, and he displayed an enlarged copy of his licence in the reception area. [2.2] A core element of the services the complainant and her husband sought related to immigration. [2.3] The complainant and her husband understood they were dealing with Mr Fernyhough’s practice, but an...

7. Te Amo v Nicholas - Te Whaiti-Nui-A-Toi (2023) 306 Waiariki MB 7 (306 WAR 7) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...invitees, from occupying the land and directing Mrs Nicholas to remove the current structure, known as the shed, from the land within a six-month timeframe. However, the issuing of final orders is delayed pending Phyllis Nicholas filing an occupation licence application with the trustees. The trustees are to convene a meeting of trustees to properly consider the application. I have directed that this process should all be completed within four months from the date of this judgment....

8. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...both that the complainant had a job offer and a New Zealand partner. [2.5] Mr Hakaoro dishonestly told the complainant Immigration New Zealand was considering her request after it had declined both requests. [2.6] When this Tribunal cancelled his licence, Mr Hakaoro did not tell his client. [3] Mr Hakaoro has not responded to the complaint with an explanation or justification addressing the grounds of complaint. [4] The Tribunal has concluded it must uphold the complaint, as the mate...

9. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 19 (6 July 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Brendon Barry, with an employment agreement for work in Blenheim with BK Horticulture Ltd. He signed it on 26 August 2009. The agreement had been “pre-signed” by BK Horticulture Ltd. [6.5] BK Horticulture Ltd had limited work available and its licence to employ seasonal workers under the relevant policy was about to expire. The Adviser did not inform the Complainants of those difficulties. [6.6] The Adviser submitted applications for work permits to Immigration New Zealand. Thos...

10. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 26 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

    ...provides: “Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are – (a) caution or censure; (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period; (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions; (d) cancellation of licence; (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years, or until...