Search Results

1. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...both that the complainant had a job offer and a New Zealand partner. [2.5] Mr Hakaoro dishonestly told the complainant Immigration New Zealand was considering her request after it had declined both requests. [2.6] When this Tribunal cancelled his licence, Mr Hakaoro did not tell his client. [3] Mr Hakaoro has not responded to the complaint with an explanation or justification addressing the grounds of complaint. [4] The Tribunal has concluded it must uphold the complaint, as the mate...

2. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 19 (6 July 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Brendon Barry, with an employment agreement for work in Blenheim with BK Horticulture Ltd. He signed it on 26 August 2009. The agreement had been “pre-signed” by BK Horticulture Ltd. [6.5] BK Horticulture Ltd had limited work available and its licence to employ seasonal workers under the relevant policy was about to expire. The Adviser did not inform the Complainants of those difficulties. [6.6] The Adviser submitted applications for work permits to Immigration New Zealand. Thos...

3. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 26 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...provides: “Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are – (a) caution or censure; (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period; (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions; (d) cancellation of licence; (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years, or until...

4. Saul v Ramos [2014] NZIACDT 114 (21 October 2014) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...the Tribunal treats it that way. [12] The lack of care and the failure to document her engagement properly are significant matters also. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Training [13] I have considered cancelling Ms Ramos’ full licence and only permitting her to hold a provisional licence and practice under supervision. However, my view of the circumstances in which the unauthorised use of funds occurred, do not make such an order necessary. Further, the Registrar has...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 26 - UO v Nukulasi (23 June 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...and indeed has always admitted that she had breached the Code. She understands her failings. In the last two years, Ms Nukulasi has exceeded the requirements of compulsory continuing practice development, including supervision of a provisional licence holder. [14] It is noted by Mr Laurent that the Registrar proposes a modest penalty of $1,000. He observes that delays were a feature in Suresh v Elizabeth2 and WQ v Emberson.3 Counsel contends that Ms Nukulasi’s wrongdoing is no...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 40 - NZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin (25 September 2020) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...will only be briefly summarised here. [5] Mr Oulu Jin is a licensed immigration adviser and director of Oulu’s Immigration Firm Limited, of Shanghai. At the material time, he was provisionally licensed but since May 2020, he has held a full licence. [6] The client, a national of China, was living in New Zealand. He intended to make an Essential Skills work visa application and required an assessment by NZQA of his overseas qualification. [7] On 16 November 2018, Mr Jin s...

7. READT annual report 2021 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...Tribunal is established pursuant to s 100 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Its functions are set out in s 102 of the Act, and are: (a) to hear and determine any application made by a Complaints Assessment Committee for the suspension of the licence of a licensee pending the determination of a charge that the Committee has laid against the licensee (b) to hear and determine any charge against a licensee brought by the Committee (c) to hear any appeal under section 111 agains...

8. CAC 401 v Black and Wong [2016] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...submissions from the Complaints Assessment Committee and Mr Wong’s counsel. The relevant potential penalties are contained in s 110 of the Act. Summary of Orders [3] The orders that the Tribunal may make are: (i) An order cancelling the licence of the licensee. (ii) An order suspending the licence for a period not exceeding 24 months. (iii) An order that the licensee not perform any supervisory functions. (iv) An order that the licensee who is an individual pay a fine not e...

9. 2020 NZPSPLA 021 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...been approved. However, all of Mr Biddle’s misconduct occurred before he was granted a COA and Mr Biddle has asked that his COA not be cancelled as he has recently started working as a property guard for Allied Security which is one of the larger licence holders in New Zealand. He now accepts what he did was wrong and that he has learnt from his mistakes. [15] I accept that Mr Biddle was following the very poor example set by Mr Fevers and the lax business practices at Club Envy whe...

10. 2024 NZPSPLA 010 pdf [pdf, 75 KB]

    ...this he is no longer suitable to be a responsible security worker. If his COA had not expired, I would have cancelled it. As Mr Timoti is serving a lengthy prison sentence the only other appropriate penalty is to bar Mr Timoti from applying for a licence or certificate. I consider the appropriate period for the bar is six years. [5] I also note that Mr Timoti’s convictions are grounds for disqualification from reapplying for a certificate for seven years from the date of his convic...