Search Results

1. Singh v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 22 (7 July 2011) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...things the Adviser would not condone, and should not be responsible for. General comments: [10.14] When the Complainant first lodged her application, offshore advisers could operate without being licensed. [10.15] The Adviser’s New Zealand licence “should not be impeached” on the basis of what was occurring in Fiji. [10.16] The Adviser was not licensed at the time. [10.17] The Adviser would investigate the possibility of the former staff member refunding fees. Decision...

2. Kartikeya v Fernyhough [2014] NZIACDT 79 (09 September 2014) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...complainant and her husband attended the adviser’s office. They had the name of a person working there. The signs at the premises indicated it was the practice of Mr Fernyhough, a licensed immigration adviser, and he displayed an enlarged copy of his licence in the reception area. [2.2] A core element of the services the complainant and her husband sought related to immigration. [2.3] The complainant and her husband understood they were dealing with Mr Fernyhough’s practice, but an...

3. Te Amo v Nicholas - Te Whaiti-Nui-A-Toi (2023) 306 Waiariki MB 7 (306 WAR 7) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...invitees, from occupying the land and directing Mrs Nicholas to remove the current structure, known as the shed, from the land within a six-month timeframe. However, the issuing of final orders is delayed pending Phyllis Nicholas filing an occupation licence application with the trustees. The trustees are to convene a meeting of trustees to properly consider the application. I have directed that this process should all be completed within four months from the date of this judgment....

4. ARLA - Form 17 Application for managers certificate [docx, 14 KB]

   ...Transport Act 1998 not contained in Part 6, and offences to which the Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004 applies)] • Has the applicant had any experience (in particular recent experience) in controlling any premises or conveyance in respect of which a licence was in force? Yes/No If Yes, what are the details and dates of that experience? [state] • Has the applicant had any relevant training, in particular, recent training? Yes/No If Yes, what are the details of that training and on wha...

5. Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Energy Resources Levy Amendment Bill [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...the final version includes amendments that affect the conclusions in this advice. 3. The Bill amends the Energy Resources Levy Act 1976 (the principal Act) and aims to clarify levy payment obligations on fossil gas produced from pre-1986 petroleum licences. 4. There are inconsistent approaches to achieving a fair return on the Crown’s fossil gas resources through petroleum royalty rates, depending on when licenses or permits were granted for gas discoveries. The principal Act impo...

6. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...both that the complainant had a job offer and a New Zealand partner. [2.5] Mr Hakaoro dishonestly told the complainant Immigration New Zealand was considering her request after it had declined both requests. [2.6] When this Tribunal cancelled his licence, Mr Hakaoro did not tell his client. [3] Mr Hakaoro has not responded to the complaint with an explanation or justification addressing the grounds of complaint. [4] The Tribunal has concluded it must uphold the complaint, as the mate...

7. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 19 (6 July 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Brendon Barry, with an employment agreement for work in Blenheim with BK Horticulture Ltd. He signed it on 26 August 2009. The agreement had been “pre-signed” by BK Horticulture Ltd. [6.5] BK Horticulture Ltd had limited work available and its licence to employ seasonal workers under the relevant policy was about to expire. The Adviser did not inform the Complainants of those difficulties. [6.6] The Adviser submitted applications for work permits to Immigration New Zealand. Thos...

8. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 26 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...provides: “Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are – (a) caution or censure; (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period; (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions; (d) cancellation of licence; (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years, or until...

9. Saul v Ramos [2014] NZIACDT 114 (21 October 2014) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...the Tribunal treats it that way. [12] The lack of care and the failure to document her engagement properly are significant matters also. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Training [13] I have considered cancelling Ms Ramos’ full licence and only permitting her to hold a provisional licence and practice under supervision. However, my view of the circumstances in which the unauthorised use of funds occurred, do not make such an order necessary. Further, the Registrar has...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 26 - UO v Nukulasi (23 June 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...and indeed has always admitted that she had breached the Code. She understands her failings. In the last two years, Ms Nukulasi has exceeded the requirements of compulsory continuing practice development, including supervision of a provisional licence holder. [14] It is noted by Mr Laurent that the Registrar proposes a modest penalty of $1,000. He observes that delays were a feature in Suresh v Elizabeth2 and WQ v Emberson.3 Counsel contends that Ms Nukulasi’s wrongdoing is no...