Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 290 Save the Maitai Inc v Nelson City Council [pdf, 736 KB]

   ...demolition. Methods RE6.6.ii Resource consent requirement, with specific matters of control. Add to the ‘Contents of Residential Zone rule table’: REr.106D Maitahi Bayview Structure Plan (Schedule X) Add a new rule REr.106D Item Permitted Controlled Discretionary / Non- Complying Assessment criteria Explanation REr.106D Maitahi/Ma hitahi Bayview Structure Plan (Schedule X) REr.106D.1 Schedule X applies REr.106D.2 Schedule X applies REr.1...

2. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved in the matter and otherwise in accordance with the LCRO Publication Guidelines. [179] The respondent is permitted to disclose the full text of this decision to the Firm’s insurer. DATED this 19TH day of September 2024 _____________________ FR Goldsmith Legal Complaints Review Officer In accordance with s 213 of the Act, co...

3. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 792 KB]

   ...• leveraging the company’s core competencies by entering into long-term leasing of land for dairy and sheep and beef farming • optimising the company’s genetic capability by marketing its genetically superior sheep, beef and deer • to permit wind farming on its properties as an adjunct to its core farming business and where appropriate, for the purpose of supplying primarily its own energy needs, to develop, operate and own small scale wind turbines on its properties, whether...

4. Ryang v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...soakings. While Mr Jones and Mr Wiemann had some doubt as to whether such retro-fitting was good trade practice, Mr Smith gave evidence that it was a proper installation. Indeed Mr Smith was involved in writing the EIFS installation material permitting such retro- fitting. [91] Mr Stone, who was a Council officer, gave evidence that at the time of his inspection during construction the builder told him that he intended to apply the “PutzTechnik solution 300” cladding. T...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 193 Brial v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...of�natural�materials�such�as�timber,�steel�or�stone�and�to�be�consistent�with�traditional�rural� elements.� � i)� Access�to�the�allotments�is�to�be�of�gravel�formation�with�swale�edge�as�necessary.�Concrete� kerb�and�channel�is�not�permitted.�� � j)� All�landscaping�as�shown�on�the�plans�stamped�as�approved�by�condition�one�(1)�of�RM181560� shall� be� maintained� by�...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 144 CBA v ONM [pdf, 577 KB]

   ...comprehensive RTW plan with the assistance of a private mediator. They are to be commended for concluding what was, in the circumstances, a significant agreement. It was accordingly unnecessary for the Court to consider making an order directing ONM to permit CBA to return to work immediately, as had been pleaded. [16] I mention a final preliminary point. In the first interlocutory judgment, I directed that an interim order on non-publication of name and details, which had been...

7. Research into the New Life Akoranga Programme of the Mahi Tahi Trust [pdf, 649 KB]

   ...with tikanga Mäori it gives the tangata whenua (the inmates) an opportunity to welcome their manuhiri (the mentors) into their environment. Secondly, it accords the mentors tangata whenua status; passing to them control of subsequent proceedings and permits them to come into the prison to share their knowledge. Everywhere we go we are prepared for, and most times we expect to be given, a pöwhiri. It just makes everything tika and it shows the bro’s that we come in peace. The wairua will...

8. [2017] NZEnvC 180 Ngai te hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...the Court. THE ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST is hereby granted the following resource consents: a) To abandon the remains of the MV Rena, its equipment and cargo and associated debris on Otaiti, in the Coastal Marine Area, Bay of Plenty; and b) To permit any future discharge of contaminants (including harmful substances) from the MV Rena, its equipment and cargo and associated debris to the Coastal Marine Area, Bay of Plenty, subject to the following conditions: A. Purpose, scope and p...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 166 Alim v Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...the functions of a director of PRI, and that he held himself out as being authorised to exercise these functions. It is also the case that the de jure directors must have been well aware of his actions, so that it should be concluded that PRI permitted him to act as a director. [114] In summary, I find that Mr Hay was a guiding mind for the purposes of the litigation, in his capacity as a de facto director of PRI. 44 Delegat v...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 190 Jacks Point v Queesntown Lakes District Council [pdf, 7.1 MB]

    ...emphasis).'· Further, the court determined that the relevant s274 parties were "not entitled to be heard on their wish for a requirement for their approval to dispensing with notification of resource consent applications for building above the permitted height limit" (my emphasis).'9 [34] Section 274 has not materially changed since Beasley was decided. It was an oral decision of then Principal Environment Judge Sheppard and concerned whether a s274 party could...