Search Results

1. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved in the matter and otherwise in accordance with the LCRO Publication Guidelines. [179] The respondent is permitted to disclose the full text of this decision to the Firm’s insurer. DATED this 19TH day of September 2024 _____________________ FR Goldsmith Legal Complaints Review Officer In accordance with s 213 of the Act, co...

2. Regulatory Impact Statement: Changing name suppression settings in sexual violence cases [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...open justice. 14. The court can restrict the sharing of information relevant to criminal proceedings through suppression orders. The main legislative settings for suppression orders are set out in the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (the CPA), which permit interim and 4 New Zealand Law Commission (2015), The Justice Response to Victims of Sexual Violence: Criminal Trials and Alternative Processes [NZLC R136]. Available at: https://www.lawcom.govt.nz/our-work/alternative-models-for- proc...

3. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2008) 87 Taupo MB 107 (87 TPO 107) [pdf, 14 MB]

   ...either 811 }Iwestor is abJe to manage those risks Q£ tbe investor cBnofford to lose money (or assets) Such factors are obviously far more ll])porlant for entities such as Ahu Whenua Tms/s 1I'ho, b)' Uwir nature, arc lJOt (in geneml teFl])s) permit/cd /0 be risk takers. Paragraphs 7 and 8 of Uw Jeller concede that this is a risk ]ViUl Ule deposlt hOll'ever nothllJg of subs/ance (fi'OJ)} UJe leller) is aV8JJabJc to offset UJat risk. In ordlIJ8T), commCTcial terms J con...

4. Sexual violence attrition and progression report [pdf, 762 KB]

   Attrition and progression Reported sexual violence victimisations in the criminal justice system Ministry of Justice 1 November 2019 2019 © Crown Copyright ISBN 978-0-478-32486-0 (online) Published by the Ministry of Justice Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any ot

5. [2024] NZEnvC 167 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 6.6 MB]

   ...nuisance algae and macrophytes and support the natural movement of indigenous fish and valued introduced species such as trout); and (g) Lowering of the groundwater levels of the Aupōuri aquifer such that existing efficient bore takes operating as a permitted activity or in accordance with resource consent conditions cannot access the authorised volume of groundwater. Independent Water Effects Review and Irrigation Efficiency Review Panels 2MC. Prior to the exercise of any consents, the G...

6. 2023-10-17-WK-Opening-legal-submissions.pdf [pdf, 604 KB]

   ...Project. The extent of the proposed designations is shown on the plans and drawings in Volume III of the AEE. Resource consents 33. Waka Kotahi lodged applications with Horizons and GWRC for a range of consents including land use consents, water permits, and discharge permits (to land, water and air) to authorise the activities necessary for the construction and operation of the Project. The relevant activities include:35 (a) earthworks; (b) vegetation clearance; (c) activit...

7. MLC 2019 July National Panui [pdf, 351 KB]

   ...required to enable us to forward a copy of the monthly National Pänui to you. Information about you will not be disclosed to any other person in a form that will identify you except where you have consented to such disclosure or where such is required or permitted by the Privacy Act 1993 or otherwise as permitted by law. You may at any time contact us to check the details held and request changes by writing to the Pänui Analyst, DX Box SX11203, Wellington, or by email to MLCpanui@justice....

8. Hall v Opepe Farm Trust (2010) 19 Waiariki MB 258 (19 WAR 258) [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...held responsible. That is incorrect since they were appointed in November 2001. They then said that they had opposed the investment. That claim is not supported by their statements to the Court in May 2002 or their subsequent conduct in both permitting further funds to be invested on such a significant scale and in not having their dissent recorded per s 227 of the Act. The Respondents claimed they relied on the advice of Dr Severne, an interim trustee, and should not be removed f...

9. Hartley v Balemi [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...position. In this respect the law can be stated as follows: 1. The builder of a house owes a duty of care in tort to future owners. 2. For present purposes that duty is to take reasonable care to build the house in accordance with the building permit and the relevant building code and bylaws. 3. The position is no different when the builder is also the owner. An owner/builder owes a like duty of care in tort to future owners. Claim No 1276 – Hartley (correcte...

10. Final-Technical-Assessment-A-Transport-v2.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ...the site throughout the Project area, although some may be batched on site. Compared to aggregate and earthworks movements these are expected to be comparatively low and not significant. Delivery of pre-cast beams may require over dimension permits and hence may be scheduled to use the road network outside of peak hours. (f) Paving: The delivery of paving materials to the site will involve an expected peak of 90 heavy vehicles per day (180 movements) over the paving period o...