[2016] NZEmpC 166 Alim v Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]
...the functions of a director of PRI, and that he held himself out as being authorised to exercise these functions. It is also the case that the de jure directors must have been well aware of his actions, so that it should be concluded that PRI permitted him to act as a director. [114] In summary, I find that Mr Hay was a guiding mind for the purposes of the litigation, in his capacity as a de facto director of PRI. 44 Delegat v...