Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...authorise any person or class of persons to authorise specified activities that would otherwise be prohibited by an order made under the COVID-19 Act. The section also provides that if a thing can be prohibited under the COVID-19 Act, it can be permitted but only subject to specified conditions.33 [147] Section 13 describes the legal application of the effect of orders. It states that a s 11 order may not be held invalid just because it is, or authorises any act or omission that...

2. Auckland District Law Society v Dorbu [2010] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...lawyers, the Registrar of the Family Court, the Bank of New Zealand, a firm of real estate agents and Mr Barge. The Tribunal declined the applications made by Mr Dorbu following which the application for review referred to was filed and Mr Dorbu was permitted time for that to be heard and determined before the substantive hearing continued. [28] In addition, Mr Dorbu on the first day of the hearing presented the Tribunal with a medical certificate indicating that he was not in a...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 123 Wiles v University of Auckland [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...other tertiary institutions) be preserved and enhanced.16 [84] In exercising their academic freedom and autonomy, universities must act in a manner that is consistent with: (a) the need to maintain the highest ethical standards and the need to permit public scrutiny to ensure the maintenance of those standards; and (b) the need to be accountable and make proper use of resources allocated to them.17 [85] In this context, academic freedom means that, as they carry out their work,...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 228 Ministry of Housing and Urban Development v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Management Act 1991 the Council will give specific consideration to those persons listed in Rule C1.13(4). I334.6. Standards The standards applicable to the overlays, zones and Auckland-wide provisions apply in this precinct. All activities listed as permitted, controlled or restricted discretionary in Tables I334.4.1, I334.4.2 and I334.4.3 must comply with the following standards. I334.6.1. Floodlights (1) Where floodlights are located adjacent to a residential zone, the hours...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - District 12 Wellington District [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...interests of Ngati Raukawa and Te Ati Awa. Some migrated further south to Arapaoa and to the Marlborough Sounds, others to Whanganui-a-Tara.64 Included within that movement were the Taranaki and Ngati Ruanui contingent of Te Heke Paukena who were permitted to settle between the Waitangi and Te Aro streams by the Ngati Mutunga chiefNgatata-i-te-rangj,65 The section ofNgati Tama who had maintained a presence at Kaiwharawhara since 1825 attempted to take advantage of the hiatus resulting fr...

6. Guidelines on common core documents [pdf, 528 KB]

   ...report should explain the nature and extent of, and reasons for every such factor and difficulty, if any such exist; and should give details of the steps being taken to overcome these. C.5 Restrictions or limitations. Certain articles of the Covenant permit some defined restrictions or limitations on rights. Where these exist, their nature and extent should be set out. C.6 Data and statistics. A report should include sufficient data and statistics to enable the Committee to assess progr...

7. Grants-Handbook-v4.81.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Act. Matters involving immigration decisions Legal aid is not available for some proceedings about a decision or matter under the Immigration Act 2009 pursuant to s 12(1) the Act. The applicant will need to provide confirmation of their visa or permit, country of residence and citizenship. AID MAY BE REFUSED WHERE: • the proceedings involve a decision under the Immigration Act 2009 in relation to a person who: o is unlawfully in New Zealand in terms of the Immigration Act 2009...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 044 Donaldson v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   DONALDSON v QLDC – TOPIC 31 – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 44 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN ROGER LINDSAY DONALDSON (ENV-2019-CHC-24) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: In

9. Grants Handbook v4.83.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Act. Matters involving immigration decisions Legal aid is not available for some proceedings about a decision or matter under the Immigration Act 2009 pursuant to s 12(1) the Act. The applicant will need to provide confirmation of their visa or permit, country of residence and citizenship. AID MAY BE REFUSED WHERE: • the proceedings involve a decision under the Immigration Act 2009 in relation to a person who: o is unlawfully in New Zealand in terms of the Immigration Act 2009...

10. Grants Handbook v4.85.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...Act. Matters involving immigration decisions Legal aid is not available for some proceedings about a decision or matter under the Immigration Act 2009 pursuant to s 12(1) the Act. The applicant will need to provide confirmation of their visa or permit, country of residence and citizenship. AID MAY BE REFUSED WHERE: • the proceedings involve a decision under the Immigration Act 2009 in relation to a person who: o is unlawfully in New Zealand in terms of the Immigration Act 2009...