Search Results

1. 2019 Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 490 KB]

   ...• leveraging the company’s core competencies by entering into long-term leasing of land for dairy and sheep and beef farming • optimising the company’s genetic capability by marketing its genetically superior sheep, beef and deer • to permit wind farming on its properties as an adjunct to its core farming business and where appropriate, for the purpose of supplying primarily its own energy needs, to develop, operate and own small scale wind turbines on its properties, wh...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 37 Vice-Chancellor of Massey University v Wrigley and Kelly [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...information not be disclosed. It also contains, in s 52(3)(a), a savings provision in very similar words to that in s 7 of the Privacy Act set out above. [86] Both the Privacy Act 13 and the Official Information Act 14 contain provisions permitting requests for information to be refused on various grounds. Mr Chemis submitted that these were relevant under s 4(1C)(a). We do not accept that submission. Those provisions confer a discretion not to disclose information, albeit...

3. LCRO 136/2017 RAI and SEM v EYR, IPA and DYN (26 November 2018) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...better the contact arrangements between [J] and [Ms JOP] and the better the lifestyle etc for [J] in [City 1], the greater your prospect of succeeding is. I will discuss with you more in person, but one of the considerations where relocations are permitted is a really good co-operative relationship between the parents. That is, if the Court is satisfied that you will do everything in your power 4 to maintain and develop [J] and [Ms JOP’s] relationship despite the distance (rathe...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...same way the Court does and for much the same reasons. This analysis is bolstered by considering the changes made to sch 2 and to the Employment Relations Authority Regulations from December 2004. The change was to introduce cl 4A into sch 2 permitting the service out of New Zealand of any document relating to a matter before the Authority. At about the same time regs 19A and 19B were introduced. Under reg 19A the Authority was empowered to grant leave to serve a party overseas.48...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...supported by tangata whenua including Ngā Hapū o Poutama and whānau and hapū affiliating primarily with Ngāti Maniapoto and Tainui waka.48 Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Tama opposed the application on the basis that it would set an unintended precedent permitting “non-tangata whenua” to create a large Māori reservation in areas that traditionally fall within the domain of other iwi, in this instance Ngāti Tama. Such groups could then act contrary to the wishes of tangata whenua...

6. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...empowers the Court to grant commissions while s 38 includes provision for the Court to approve reimbursements. These are additional powers over and above the Court’s general supervisory jurisdiction regarding fees and expenses where the Court may permit payments to be made to trustees, even in circumstances where the strict formalities and procedures set out in the trust order have not been followed.18 Clause 4.2 of the trust order also specifically enables the Court to approve...

7. [2015] NZSSAA 84 (13 November 2015) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...in good faith; (d) the beneficiary changed his position believing he was entitled to receive the money and would not have to repay it; and (e) it would be inequitable in all the circumstances, including the debtor’s financial circumstances, to permit recovery. [104] Pursuant to s 86(9B) of the Act, the term “error” includes: (a) the provision of incorrect information by an officer of the Ministry; (b) an erroneous act or omission occurring during an investigation of benefit e...

8. [2009] NZEmpC AC 49/09 Norske Skog Tasman Ltd v Manufacturing and Construction Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...challenges or other proceedings suggests strongly that Parliament intended the Court to be able to grant effective and appropriate remedies. As already noted, we are not aware of any other appellate structure, especially in which hearings de novo are permitted, that precludes effectual remedies in some cases. [41] We are confident that, when subs(2) was inserted into s183, Parliament did not intend to deprive the Court of jurisdiction to effectively discharge a major part of its...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 44 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & SFWU [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...further consideration, possibly in the context of the plaintiff‟s personal grievance. Remedies are also reserved. [95] It is, however, accepted by the defendant that there are no express statutory provisions in subpart 1 of part 6A which would permit a new employer to decline to accept an employee entitled to transfer on grounds such as misrepresentation, fraud, criminal record or the like. Such grounds may provide an employee with justification for declining the employment...

10. LCRO 197/2017 SM v HW (29 March 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...the former client would be undermined. [96] Rules 8.7 and 8.7.1:17 … reflect the exercise by the Court of its inherent jurisdiction to control its own processes, one of the aspects of which is the power to determine which persons should be permitted to appear before it as advocates. [97] For the prohibition in r 8.7.1 to apply, the circumstances described in paragraphs (a) to (d) of the rule must all be present.18 - confidential information held [98] Paragraph (a) require...