Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 010 Northport Limited v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...sought various amendments for the port. Although it is not directly relevant for current purposes, they were resolved by consent order on 30 March 2021. It is important to note that it included port management subareas within PORTZ to facilitate permitted commercial and industrial activities and specified port management area B (shown in “A” as attached). Northport noise submission Ms McGrath, the planner for the Council, neatly summarises that the Northport submission to...

2. Appendix-14-Regional-Councils-Response-to-combined-request-for-information-under-section-92.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...taking water is provided in Volume II. The strategy is to minimise the taking of surface water by utilising water on site, in the first instance, where it is practicable to do so. For example, through the use of an existing bore water where it is permitted to be used for road construction purposes. Further, Appendix 4.7 of the Design and Construction Report provides information and analysis on surface water demands and constraints. This includes approaches to managing water takes to en...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 237 View West Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...alternative method to achieve the AUP demolition objective. [95] We have more fundamental issues with the alternative proposed in this case given that: (a) there is no current application before us for this alternative (or any other); (b) it is not a permitted or controlled activity and would require a resource consent; and (c) any such resource consent is going to be difficult to assess and will involve a number of factors including the significant heritage values of this sit...

4. LCRO 2011 Annual Report [pdf, 919 KB]

   ...attributes of a barrister. It is his duty to not keep back from the court any information which ought to be before it, and he must in no way mislead the court by stating facts that are untrue, or mislead the judge as to the true facts, or knowingly permit a client to attempt to deceive the court. How far a barrister may go on behalf of his client is a question too difficult to be capable of abstract definition, but when concrete cases arise one can see for oneself whether what he has done...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 228 Ministry of Housing and Urban Development v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Management Act 1991 the Council will give specific consideration to those persons listed in Rule C1.13(4). I334.6. Standards The standards applicable to the overlays, zones and Auckland-wide provisions apply in this precinct. All activities listed as permitted, controlled or restricted discretionary in Tables I334.4.1, I334.4.2 and I334.4.3 must comply with the following standards. I334.6.1. Floodlights (1) Where floodlights are located adjacent to a residential zone, the hours...

6. Regulatory Impact Statement - Criminal justice proposals to counter foreign interference in New Zealand [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...1990 is expressed to “affirm, protect and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms in New Zealand”, and to “affirm New Zealand’s commitment to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”. 73. While foreign states are permitted to try to influence government decisions and the views of New Zealanders, a core basis of this work is that this should be done openly, not impact on New Zealand sovereignty, or cause harm to those under New Zealand’s protection. 74...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 284 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...consent, the activity authorised by this consent must be carried out in accordance with the application and documents submitted as part of the application, including the following documents: (a) WSP OPUS: Reference: 1-19430.06 - Application for Water Permit to take and use groundwater, dated August 2019; (b) Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Williamson Water & Land Advisory Ltd: Aupōuri Aquifer Groundwater Take Consent Applications, Assessment of Environmental Effec...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 295 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 803 KB]

   ...prepared by Wild Ecology. In addition, this plan shall detail a suitable “pedestrian bridge crossing” located on Lot 31 as shown on the ESDCDPP for the purpose of facilitating safe and practical pedestrian access, such design to comply as a permitted single span bridge pursuant to Rule C.2.1.8(4) of Proposed Regional Plan. Furthermore, within the four unplanted recreational nodes as shown on the ESDCDPP, two picnic tables and two viewing seats (in total) shall be provided. For t...

9. Waitangi Tribunal - District 12 Wellington District [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...interests of Ngati Raukawa and Te Ati Awa. Some migrated further south to Arapaoa and to the Marlborough Sounds, others to Whanganui-a-Tara.64 Included within that movement were the Taranaki and Ngati Ruanui contingent of Te Heke Paukena who were permitted to settle between the Waitangi and Te Aro streams by the Ngati Mutunga chiefNgatata-i-te-rangj,65 The section ofNgati Tama who had maintained a presence at Kaiwharawhara since 1825 attempted to take advantage of the hiatus resulting fr...

10. Guidelines on common core documents [pdf, 528 KB]

    ...report should explain the nature and extent of, and reasons for every such factor and difficulty, if any such exist; and should give details of the steps being taken to overcome these. C.5 Restrictions or limitations. Certain articles of the Covenant permit some defined restrictions or limitations on rights. Where these exist, their nature and extent should be set out. C.6 Data and statistics. A report should include sufficient data and statistics to enable the Committee to assess progr...