Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 025 Minister of Corrections v Otorohanga District Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...PRISON OPERATIONS 1. All buildings on the site which are designed to hold prisoners overnight shall be contained within secure perimeters. 2. No additional vehicle entrances or road intersections with Waikeria Road or Wharepuhunga Road shall be permitted without Otorohanga District Council 's consent (as road controlling authority) for the location , design and construction of the vehicle entrances or road intersections. 3. In the event of an escape from Waikeria Prison, the...

2. Review of community-based sentences in New Zealand [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...the removal of the upper age limit for those on whom the sentence could be imposed, the 1966 amendments limited the group of offenders excluded from the sentence (i.e. those who had served a previous institutional sentence) to those under 21, and permitted the offender to be placed on probation concurrently with, and not merely subsequently to, periodic detention, although the probation period could still continue for up to one year after the end of the periodic detention. By this time th...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 106 Rangitane o Tamaki Nui a Rua Incorporated v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 861 KB]

   ...downstream of the discharge location. G9. The Consent Holder shall commence an investigation into alternative methods and treatment and discharge (Alternatives Investigation) on or before five years from the expiry of these consents (discharge permits). The Alternatives Investigation shall be undertaken in consultation with the relevant iwi authorities. The findings of the Alternatives Investigation shall be provided to the relevant iwi authorities, the Tararua District Wastewate...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 187 Hawkes Bay Fish Game Council v Hawkes Bay Regional Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...submission can only fai rly be regarded as 'on' a variation if it is addressed to the extent to which the varialion changes the pre-existing status quo. 2. But if the effect of regarding a submission as 'on' a variation would be to permit a planning instrument to be appreciably amended without real opportunily for participation by those potentially affected, this is a powerful consideration against any argument that the submission is truly 'on' the variat...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 183 Grenadier Ltd v Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...89 NOE 12 October 2023 at 174. 44 area and the Tirotirowhetū Zone as a whole where earthworks and vegetation clearance are a controlled activity, for which consent cannot be declined. Moreover, as we heard in evidence there are a range of permitted activities which can occur within much of this area as of right including primary production activities (agricultural, horticultural and intensive farming among other activities) and plantation forestry.90 All of those are likely...

6. Mills v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2019] NZHRRT 47 [PDF, 731 KB]

   ...Whether the HVDHB breached IPP 2 [71] IPP 2 requires that where an agency collects personal information the agency must collect the information directly from the individual concerned, unless the agency believes on reasonable grounds that one of the permitted exceptions applies. In this case information was not collected directly from Mr Mills but from Facebook and from Employee X. The HVDHB therefore has the onus of proving one of the exceptions in IPP 2 applied. See s 87 of the Priva...

7. Nakarawa v AFFCO NZ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...the company if he could not work on Saturdays and that he should go home. Following further discussion Mr Nakarawa was given the choice of either going home or working the shift before finishing off. Following a request by Mr Nakarawa that he be permitted to work two days in the following week before finishing off, this was accepted. On his last night at work and just prior to the shift ending, Mr Casey approached Mr Nakarawa to confirm that that would be Mr Nakarawa’s last day of wo...

8. FINAL Restorative Justice Survey Report September 2021 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...11% 8% Wanted the offender to pay reparation to me/my family 7% 5% Base: 2021 n=241, 2018 n=357 (all respondents excluding those who did not answer the question). Table lists respondents given by 5% or more of respondents. Multiple responses permitted therefore percentages may total more than 100%. Red text indicates a signif icant decline when compared with the previous measure. The only statistically significant differences by demographics were that females were significantly...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 65 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...June 2014. [22] Mr Alford had agreed that Mr Farrimond could retain his cell phone number, which he had long held. Although he was asked to return the cell phone which Caffe Coffee had provided to him, on his final day of employment, he was permitted to retain it when he advised his manager that he had not organised a replacement and his fiancé needed to be able to contact him. A SIM Card for the cell phone was returned; it will be necessary to review the circumstances of this...

10. [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [pdf, 431 KB]

    ...or senior pastor could only be appointed and dismissed with the approval of the Mother Church. [100] The Payroll Regulations also indicated that Pastors should work eight hours per day, with phone access, except for public holidays. They were permitted to carry out work outside of the Church, but limitations were placed on the amount of days that could be worked outside of the Church. Further, any payment received as a result of such work needed to be returned to the Church. [...