Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Wellington Standards Committee 1 v McCardle [2025] NZLCDT 3 (10 January 2025) [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...in a timely manner. [31] Mr McCardle’s conduct in delegating the remaining executive functions of his duties to a beneficiary is not the prime focus of the charges although it provides the context in which the Deed was created. We agreed to permit Ms Fee to file a memorandum following the formal hearing. She has done so, advising that Mr McCardle had made an offer to Mr S to resolve the outstanding duties to the charity beneficiaries. That is material evidence that Mr McCardle...

2. Estate of Moloney v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 203 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...claimants. The fact that the matter ended up before a review, and the Reviewer did not exercise her power to quash the Corporation’s decision, demonstrates that clarity is needed on section 32(2)(b). A live issue exists, and the appeal should be permitted to progress to a substantive hearing. 2 Sinclair v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHC 374. 13 [49] This Court notes the above submissions. However, the Court notes the following considerations. [50] First,...

3. [2025] NZREADT 06 - UX v REAA (19 February 2025) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...[59] The next step is for the parties to produce their substantive submissions on the merits of the review application. Directions (1) The complainant is to file and serve submissions in support of the application, including any application to permit new evidence, by 21 March 2025. (2) The Registrar is to file and serve submissions, including any opposition to any new evidence, by 23 April 2025. (3) The complainant is to file and serve any submissions in reply by 7 May 202...

4. [2025] NZLVT 009 - Jansseune v Kaipara District Council (14 March 2025) [pdf, 9.3 MB]

   ...However, as an experienced Environment Court Judge and supported by the Valuer Members with experience in this area, we consider it is most unlikely that a subdivision of that single knoll on which Mr Jansseune’s house is located would have been permitted, even if Mr Jansseune would accept neighbours so close. In any event, that is a matter that would affect all properties within the district of a similar type and size rather than simply Mr Jansseune’s property. Again, compara...

5. NZCASS Data tables 5 public perceptions [xlsx, 851 KB]

   ...statistics in table 41? Enquiries Contact us for further information about these and related statistics. Copyright © New Zealand Ministry of Justice, Tāhū o te Ture This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Ministry of Justice and follow any other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz...

6. NZCASS Data tables 3 who experiences crime [xlsx, 907 KB]

   ...statistics in table 29? Enquiries Contact us for further information about these and related statistics. Copyright © New Zealand Ministry of Justice, Tāhū o te Ture This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Ministry of Justice and follow any other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz...

7. Common Bundle Volume 2 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   .......................................................51 1D Schedule of spiritual and cultural beliefs, values and uses of significance to Kai Tahu .............................................................................................53 2. Schedule of specified restrictions on the exercise of permits to take surface water ...............................................................................................................58 2A Schedule of specific minimum flows for primary...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...claim, in only one of which there were third and fourth causes of action. These purported to be causes of action brought by Mr Regan. They are not, however, justiciable because Mr Regan was not in an employment relationship with PEGL and was only permitted by the Court in an earlier interlocutory judgment, to proceed with set-off defences against BAPL. In these circumstances, there are no third and fourth causes of action by Mr Beattie and/or Ms Panapa, but I have continued to al...

9. AMLCFT_Release_Pack_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 7.5 MB]

   ...businesses when complying with their AML/CFT requirements. Group wide compliance/reliance Workstream 3 Regulatory relief: This work will review the application process for establishing designated business groups (DBGs). Reporting entities are only permitted to share customer due diligence information within a financial group if they apply and are approved to form as a DBG. The application process is resource intensive and costly. Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 075 McCallum Bros Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...extraction might be discontinued after 10 to 15 years in the event of erosion of sand volumes within defined areas of the beach and dunes. [17] The consents sought were by way of “renewal” of existing consents for inshore sand extraction Permit Nos. ARC28172 and ARC28165 (for 27,000m3) and ARC28174 and ARC28173 (for 49,000m3), which commenced in 2006 following an appeal to the Environment Court, and expired on 6 September 2020.7 McCallum Bros was continuing to operate under th...