Search Results

1. 2020-12-07 Statement of Evidence of Julie Everett-Hincks on behalf of the ORC [pdf, 236 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA...

2. LCRO 241/2014 GS v YF (26 June 2018) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...[Citation removed]. 10 The standard of proof required. 8 Borrower (whether or not forwarded to and received by the appointing Borrower or Guarantor) (b) Nothing in this clause 11.4(e) shall affect the right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law. [42] The registered office for DFL was at Mr GS’ office. This meant that Mr GS’ office became the address for service on the guarantors. Notwithstanding that the Court subsequently held that service of the Notic...

3. LCDT Annual Report 2019 [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...number Tribunal. Charges 20 Application for consent to employ 1 Appeal against decline or refusal to issue practising certificate 1 Page | 6 A reduced quorum, consisting of three members (Chair, one lay member and one lawyer member), is permitted under the Act to consider applications for Interim Suppression of Name and for Interim Suspension Orders. These provisions allow speedier consideration of such applications at a considerably reduced cost. At times, in order...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...that since ACL had exercised seizure powers under the GSA, it would not now be appropriate for an order to be made under s 137 of the Act which would have the effect of reversing the exercise of those powers. [52] The GSA contains broad powers, permitting the security-holder, ACL, to do anything necessary to protect and/or exercise certain rights of appropriation. Such rights are without prejudice, or in addition, to any right which the security-holder is entitled to exercise, whe...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Dangen [2019] NZLCDT 22 [pdf, 502 KB]

   ...welfare guardian from 6 June 2014 until Mrs B’s death on 17 September 2016. Acting contrary to affidavits by claiming remuneration 9. Pursuant to Judge de Jong’s decision dated 6 June 2014 and the Court orders, the Practitioner was not permitted to claim remuneration for her services, as either welfare guardian or property manager. 10. However during the period from 1 April 2014 to 17 September 2016 the Practitioner issued 13 invoices to Mrs B, claiming a total of $62,29...

6. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Application for Interim Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 52 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...despite being notified by the Board that the process was confidential and the material was not to be published. After the Board intervened with the news media organisation the article was withdrawn. [10] Dr Webb believes that should Mr Marshall be permitted to pursue his media campaign against her it would be impossible for her to fairly respond without further aggravating matters, including her own stress. She considers that the media coverage that Mr Marshall seeks for the present pr...

7. Graeme James Lawrence - Evidence in Chief - Supplementary [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...taonga species including koura, tamure (snapper) and hapuku. 1. The Rules in the other sections shall apply to MN EMA except where inconsistent with the following rules. Where there is doubt the following shall prevail. Rule MN EMA 1 Rule MNEMA2 Permitted Monitoring equipment or taking samples for the purpose of monitoring (including compliance monitoring or mauri monitoring). Controlled Motiti Marae-based aquaculture located within the Waahi Taonga Area. The Regional Council...

8. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 72 (18 October 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...under the direction of another person [50] In Immigration New Zealand (Calder) v Ahmed, the Tribunal set out the principles applicable to distinguishing clerical work from immigration advice.15 [51] Persons who are not licensed (or exempt) are permitted to undertake clerical work only. In essence, such a person can do no more than retrieve and then record or organise information, enter data on a computer database or hard copy schedule, or record information on a form or other like...

9. Proactive release – Amendments to the District Court Rules 2014, High Court Rules 2016, Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, Court of Appeal (Criminal) Rules 2001, Supreme Court Rules 2004, and Criminal Procedure Rules 2012 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...Rules 2021 amend the Supreme Court Rules to allow the Supreme Court to receive electronic filing of all documents, including initiating documents. The amendments allow the practice to continue past the expiry of the Epidemic Notice, which currently permits the practice. Criminal Procedure Amendment Rules 2021 15. The Criminal Procedure Amendment Rules 2021 make minor changes to the Criminal Procedure Rules, including: 15.1. requiring that all documents filed in a criminal registry na...

10. Henton v CAC302 & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2015] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 243 KB]

    ... That the matter of the handling of the complaint has been fully dealt with in the Tribunal decision, and therefore the Committee takes no further action on this matter. Reason 1 3.2 The licensee seems to acknowledge that the legal position permitted deduction of commission from the deposit, but feels that the circumstances were such that they (Barfoot & Thompson Ltd) should have applied more thought and discretion to the issue. The Tribunal noted that the complainant had felt...