Cabagnot v Sampang [2015] NZIACDT 12 (27 February 2015) [pdf, 131 KB]
...resulting from the failed application. [10] He also sought $3,000 in the nature of general damages for the anxiety and disruption caused by Mr Sampang’s defective advice and professional conduct. [11] He also submitted Mr Sampang should have his licence revoked. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Discussion The gravity of the professional offending [12] This decision in relation to Mr Sampang’s licence largely turns on the gravity of the professional offending. It is no...