Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

   ...about what was intended to be the nature of a “union meeting”. [44] The Laws of New Zealand directs the reader to English law on this topic. 6 Halsbury’s Laws of England states: 7 Time off for trade union activities. An employer must permit an employee of his who is a member of an independent trade union recognised by the employer in respect of that description of employee to take time off during his working hours for the purpose of taking part in any activities of the...

2. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   ...Under this consent, water is drawn from a groundwater bore near the stream at a weekly average rate of 7.5 L/sec. 80. The only other potential water takes I am aware of are those which may occur under RMA and PNRP rules for unconsented and permitted use (e.g., for stock water and minor garden irrigation, etc). Individually, such takes can occur at rates of up to 2.5 L/sec but only for short periods at this rate (around an hour) until a daily volume of 20 m3/day is reached. Typ...

3. MK v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 45 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Ms Moores’ assessment, not on the actual care provided. Entitlement to Funding 1999 – 2002 [84] Ms Becroft acknowledges that the Corporation declined funding for this period altogether, on the basis that there was no legislative provision permitting it to retrospectively fund care for the period prior to the 2001 Act coming into force. [85] She refers to s 83 of the 2001 Act, which provides that the Corporation must provide social rehabilitation on the later of the following:...

4. Tata v Tata - Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 166 (2020 Appeal166) [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...statements. Mrs Martin must be held responsible for her actions and will be held liable to repay those funds along with the first respondents. [72] Contrast that with the situation in Pook v Matchitt – Matangareka 3B Block where this Court permitted the filing of further evidence post hearing to enable the affected trustees and parties the opportunity to provide proof of the reimbursements and allowances claimed and permitted:40 [85] In any event, there are two issues relevant t...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...[137] Mr Cammish’s letter did not refer to a specific policy or policies breached by her conduct. Instead the letter informed her that he did not accept that the use of patient information was “appropriate, reasonable in the circumstances or permitted by organisational policy, protocol or practice”. [138] Mr Mitchell was critical of the way in which the DHB developed its complaint about Ms Shaw’s handling of patient records, arguing that there were significant d...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000208 Kohler v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...site specific requests to add,modify or delete scheduled items including heritage items and trees as being covered by this minute. Paragraph 7 sets out the 2 fundamental principles to be applied in processing such requests: (i) the Court cannot permit a planning instrument to be appreciably amended without real opportunity for participation by those potentially affected, and (ii)care must be exercised on appeal to ensure that the objectives of the legislature in limiting rights of a...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 77 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...Judge Colgan was not persuaded to make any orders as sought, given the proximity of the fixture. He said that although the application was too late so far as the fixture was concerned, the just course was to decline leave at that point but to permit LSG to reapply at a later time for costs purposes. 5 [30] The Court also recorded in that decision that Ms Alim had made LSG aware of the identity of the funder of her claims on 14 March 2014; and that she had subsequently confirmed,...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 146 Yu v Zespri International Ltd [pdf, 767 KB]

   ...or other advisors instructed by the plaintiff for the purpose of the current proceedings, other than counsel, may review those documents under supervision of counsel, but will not make or retain hard or electronic copies. iii. Counsel will not permit any person other than those identified above to view the documents, or to make or retain hard or electronic copies. iv. The plaintiff will promptly inform the defendant of any Court order, request for discovery or other process that...

9. Sharing Information Safely [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...reports of concern about child welfare to Oranga Tamariki • providing a victim’s phone number and address to an agency who can provide help • making sure that emergency shelter or housing is available. CASE EXAMPLE Sharing information for a permitted purpose Divya is a social worker who requests information from Andre, a primary school teacher. She asks for information about one of Andre’s students, Stuart. Andre knows that he has a duty to consider sharing information as h...

10. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 [pdf, 521 KB]

    ...have regard to the purpose of this Act, which is to provide fair, speedy, flexible, and cost-effective services. (2) In particular, the tribunal— (a) must encourage the parties to work together on matters that are agreed; and (b) must not admit or permit unnecessary or irrelevant evidence or cross- examination; and (c) if experts are used (whether by a party or the tribunal), must consider using conferences of experts to avoid duplication of advice or evidence on matters that are or are l...