Search Results

1. INZ (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 38 (10 June 2019) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...refresher course available from Toi-Ohomai Institute of Technology. [11] There were no submissions from the complainant. [12] In his submissions (23 May 2019), Mr Cleland advises that the complaint arose within months of him first being granted a licence on 11 January 2016. With a further three years of experience in the role, including two years since he had come to understand his deficiencies, he now had direct contact with his clients and a complete record of his contact w...

2. WISE - EiC - D MacTavish - Irrigation; Geohydrology - PC7 provisions (filed 1 March 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   Regional Plan: Water for Otago Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) 18 March 2020 ii Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 iii Introduction The Otago Regional Council has prepared Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago....

3. [2022] NZIACDT 13 – BU v McCarthy (20 June 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...The narrative leading to the complaint is set out in the earlier decision of the Tribunal and will only be briefly summarised here. [5] Mr McCarthy was a licensed immigration adviser and director of Corporate Migration NZ Ltd, of [Town]. His licence expired on 27 April 2022 and he is no longer licensed. [6] The complainant and her son engaged Mr McCarthy in about December 2017 to assist the complainant’s daughter-in-law, who was unlawfully in New Zealand, in making a s 61 r...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 33 - RV v Aiolupotea (27 July 2020) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...removal of an adviser from the register and depriving him of his livelihood is a sanction of last resort.7 In respect of Mr Aiolupotea, however, the public must be protected from a dishonest practitioner without remorse for the maximum period permitted. Mr Aiolupotea will be prevented from reapplying for any licence for two years. Financial penalty [35] The Registrar submits that the financial penalty should be $5,000 – $6,000. However, having regard to the totality of penalt...

5. Information for Police if application made for Protection Order [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...protected person add their details on another piece of paper and attach to the back of this form. COURT USE ONLY: Date document is filed: (Court stamp) In the Family Court at (Court location) FAM Note: Rules 310 and 311 of the Family Courts Rules 2002 permit the applicant’s address to be omitted from the front page. PAGE 2Information for Police if application made for Protection OrderV2 November 2021 PAGE 2 Respondent (the person you’re saying you need protection from) Full nam...

6. Information for Police Form [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...protection) Full name Home Address Date of birth D D M M Y Y Y Y  Age  Phone number COURT USE ONLY: Date document is filed: (Court stamp) In the Family Court at (Court location) FAM Note: Rules 310 and 311 of the Family Courts Rules 2002 permit the applicant’s address to be omitted from the front page. PAGE 2Information for Police if application made for Protection OrderV1 June 2019 PAGE 2 Respondent (the person you’re saying you need protection from) Full name H...

7. Singh v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 27 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...upheld a complaint in this matter. [2] The facts and background are set out in the earlier decision. The three elements of the complaint upheld were, in outline: [2.1] The Adviser accepted a professional engagement to apply for a residence visa/permit. The Adviser failed to progress the work she was engaged to perform. [2.2] The Adviser failed to communicate with her client despite queries directed to her from her client. [2.3] The Adviser has failed to return personal documents. [...

8. Cavanagh v Nassiep [2012] NZIACDT 38 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...and service delivery he was entitled to expect. She then ended her practice and failed to refund him fees, or provide appropriate ongoing professional support. Further, during the last part of the time she was undertaking work illegally, as her licence had expired. [4] The complicating feature of this complaint is that Ms Nassiep was not licensed during the whole time she was providing immigration services to Mr Cavanagh. This Tribunal can only deal with the conduct of licensed immigr...

9. CAC 20002 v Kitto [2013] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...sentenced to imprisonment for two years and three months. As those convictions involved dishonesty, she is prohibited from being licensed under the Act for 10 years from 14 May 2013 by virtue of s.37(1)(a) of the Act. We understand that she let her licence lapse on 8 August 2011. [5] In so far as the defendant has filed an appeal against the Committee’s decision to lay a charge against her, that appeal need not be decided as we have heard the case and find the charge proved. The...

10. Butcher v New Zealand Transport Agency (Third Statement of Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 251 KB]

    ...religious discrimination: 3 [6.1] Despite its length the proposed document gives no particulars as to what Mr Butcher’s religious belief actually is, and why the practise of his religion is affected by the prescription of photographic drivers’ licences. [6.2] The proposed amended claim is essentially a catalogue of objections taken by Mr Butcher (and others) to photographic drivers licences but fails to advance any particularised claim of discrimination against Mr Butcher h...