[2016] NZEmpC 27 Henderson v Nelson Marlborough DHB [pdf, 109 KB]
...the defendant had acted in an “overly technical” fashion, and that it should be held to account for unnecessary costs incurred by her client in dealing with the matter. She submitted that NMDHB had “acted incorrectly”, and should not be permitted to adopt “a double standard by imposing a higher threshold of service on the plaintiff that has no mention in the legislation … which it did not adhere … itself.” e) She submitted that an award of costs should accordingly...