Search Results

1. Hohepa v Banks - Waima C30A [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 629 (2019 APPEAL 629) [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...rates. Eruini passed on in 1989. Hiwi Hohepa returned to the block in 2009 to spend the rest of his years there. There was one problem. Someone else was already living there. [2] That was because in 2002 the trustees of the Trust granted a licence to occupy the block to Pihema and Hiria Hohepa on the mistaken belief that they owned the block. They warranted to Pihema, Hiria and third-party lenders, that they owned it. Pihema and Hiria built their home on the block, and their d...

2. 2025 NZPSPLA 038.pdf [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Mr Tautali’s failings primarily relate to running a business. They do not impact significantly on his ability to be a responsible security employee. Accordingly, he may retain his COA on the condition that he can only work in security for a licenced security operator. [33] This decision will not prevent Secpro from re-applying for a new licence in the future provided they cease trading in accordance with this decision. To be successful in any new application they will however...

3. Make an appeal against a District Licensing Committee decision

   If you were a party in an application before a District Licensing Committee and you were unhappy with the decision, you can appeal. How do I appeal? You can appeal by completing: Notice of appeal against a decision of a District Licensing Committee (DLC) form You will need to include the fee of $697.00 (including GST) when sending us the Notice of Appeal. Please refer to our section on ways to pay the fee. What happens after I appeal? We will set your appeal down to be heard in the next availabl

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Alcohol Regulatory & Licensing Authority

4. [2020] NZIACDT 14 - Singh v Ryan - Sanctions (27 February 2020) [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...was also referred to the Tribunal. That complaint was upheld in a separate decision issued on 7 November 2019.2 [6] Mr Peter Graeme Ryan was until recently a licensed immigration adviser. As a result of the two complaints, he surrendered his licence on 27 September 2019. He is the sole director and shareholder of Capital Immigration Services NZ Ltd (Capital Immigration). [7] Mr Ryan was also the sole director and majority shareholder of BC International Ltd. Mr Ryan’s wi...

5. CAC 10047 v Whiteford - Penalty [2011] NZREADT 16 [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...instructions. [4] Section 110 of the Act contains the penalties that can be imposed, the relevant parts of which in this case are:- 2 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (b) an order cancelling the licence of the licensee and, in the case of a licensee that is a company, also cancelling the licence of any officer of the company: (c) an order suspending the licence of the licensee for a period not exceeding 24 months and, in the...

6. Insley v Butler - Awanui Haparapara no 2B no 1B sec 2 (2022) 227 Waiariki MB 35 (227 WAR 35) [pdf, 404 KB]

   ...[3] The application is opposed by the trustees of Awanui Haparapara 2B1B2 Ahu Whenua Trust, who claim the grounds for a constructive trust are not made out. Instead, they say any right conferred on the Butlers is better described as a bare licence, which has now either expired or been extinguished. [4] The issue for determination is whether the applicants are entitled to an order pursuant to s 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). Kōrero whānui Backgr...

7. CAC 20006 v Azimi [2014] NZREADT 97 [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...was misconduct; because she either knew that their real estate activities were fraudulent or she must have inferred that.” [4] Accordingly, we found the charges proved. The Committee’s position is that the Tribunal should cancel Ms Azimi’s licence and fine her. The Purposes and Principles of Disciplinary Orders [5] McGrath J, for a majority of the Supreme Court (Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ) in Z v CAC [2009] 1 NZLR 1 (at [97]), has stated: “… the purpose of statut...

8. NTT v Gong [2019] NZIACDT 65 (12 September 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...on 5 August 2019 in NTT v Gong.1 [2] It found that Ms Gong failed to properly document the professional relationship, as she had known the client socially prior to being instructed on the immigration matter. Ms Gong had admitted breaching the Licenced Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code). [3] It is now for the Tribunal to determine the appropriate sanctions, if any. BACKGROUND [4] The narrative leading to the complaint is set out in the decision of the Tribuna...

9. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...services. [1.2] Ms Devi failed to complete the steps required to commence the professional engagement. [1.3] An unlicensed person provided immigration services. [1.4] Ms Devi failed to ensure her client’s interests were represented when her licence was cancelled. [2] Ms Devi denies the grounds of complaint. She has provided explanations of the various aspects of the complaint. The issues are first to decide whether Ms Devi’s explanations, if true, are an adequate justification....

10. CAC 20002 v Kitto [2013] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...sentenced to imprisonment for two years and three months. As those convictions involved dishonesty, she is prohibited from being licensed under the Act for 10 years from 14 May 2013 by virtue of s.37(1)(a) of the Act. We understand that she let her licence lapse on 8 August 2011. [5] In so far as the defendant has filed an appeal against the Committee’s decision to lay a charge against her, that appeal need not be decided as we have heard the case and find the charge proved. The...