Search Results

1. Rupapera v Katene - Ngāti Tu 22D Trust (2008) 209 Aotea MB 25 (209 AOT 25) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...the existing injunction over the trust's bank accounts. It seems unusual to say the least that none of the trustees have had direct dealings with the trust's accountants to any real extent and for reasons that remain unclear they have permitted the second respondent to act as their agent. The trustees will submit to the Registrar a schedule of payments to be made from the trust's account and on receipt of the COUJi's approval, the trust's banks can be advised...

2. Auckland Standards Committees 2 and 3 v Mason [2019] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...and 5.3.2 2 Opening submissions of counsel for the Standards Committee at [6.4]. 5 [19] As already stated, this was not a situation where even informed consent would have been sufficient to permit the practitioner or his firm to act for both parties in this particular transaction. Circumstances of Charge 2 [20] In April 2016 the Standards Committee found Mr Mason guilty of two charges of unsatisfactory conduct relating to defau...

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 7 [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...mediation meeting will be required in the new year. As with previous mediations, the discussion will be con­ ducted in private. Only the Tribunal, representatives of the government agencies involved, the claimants; and members of the iwi, will be permitted to attend. The results of the mediation may be made public at a later stage. ~Bm .. aeW§@mg~"""Dm .... em""BE;.gggBmggmm.i&;mBEEmR~i~'=-"42mmmnB~m ...... ma"""mEam .. ~¥~.ms"...

4. B Ltd v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 169 (17 April 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...he had viewed, were inadequate readings for a supercharged engine such as this and explained that [car company] recommendations of oil pressure readings, which had been used by R Ltd, apply to standard engines and are the bare minimum readings permitted. 10. NH, in response to R Ltd’s witness statements, emphasised that, in R Ltd saying there were no parts left over at the end of the rebuild, it did not excuse the fact the O-rings must be fitted, and they were not fitted as they s...

5. Wise v Commissioner of Police [2020] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0028/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM297469#DLM297469 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0028/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM297473#DLM297473 5 (b) an order restraining the defendant from continuing or repeating the interference, or from engaging in, or causing or permitting others to engage in, conduct of the same kind as that constituting the interference, or conduct of any similar kind specified in the order: (c) damages in accordance with...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 117 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Company Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Crimson Consulting Ltd, above n 3, at [32]; Schenker AG v The Commerce Commission [2013] NZCA 114; Greymouth Petroleum, above n 3, at [21]. [21] Beyond the formal court record, access to the Court’s file by a non-party is only likely to be permitted where what is being pursued is for a recognised and legitimate purpose.14 The Court of Appeal in Greymouth Petroleum Holdings Ltd v Empresa Nacional Del Petróleo commented that the purpose of obtaining documents to assist, or...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 224 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Rail & Maritime Union [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Road in Woolston. 4 It is about 6 kilometres from where the Company’s main operations are located in the wharf area at Lyttelton. The two sites are separated by the Port Hills but there are both road and rail tunnels through the hills. These permit road travel between them in as little as 5 minutes and direct rail transport. [12] Operations carried out at the CityDepot are principally the storage of containers going to and from the wharf in Lyttelton and the servicing of empty...

8. KI & GI v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 152 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...May 2023). A consumer who rejects goods is generally required to return the goods at their cost, but there is no time limit placed on the return. Q Ltd placed a 7-day limit on the return of the CV Joints which I am satisfied was not reasonable or permitted by the CGA, particularly given that the CV Joints could not be re-used. I am satisfied that the time limit of 7-days put unnecessary pressure on KI to obtain replacement nuts and get the CV Joints back to Q Ltd quickly. Taking into acco...

9. Walker v Tonihi - Estate of Te Aokatoa Wirihana (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 31 (43 TKT 31) [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...been an ohaki, the customary values and practices of the iwi or the hapu associated with the land in question and whether those values and practices of the iwi or the hapu associated with the land in question and whether those values and practices permit a whāngai with our without a blood relationship to their matua whangai to take interests in land. (See for example In Re Succession to George Tukua 116 Otorohanga MB 81). In the end, however, it is a judgment call to be made by the...

10. SR v ITH [2012] NZIACDT 9 (16 March 2012) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...address and not communicating effectively. [16.3] He was unprofessional in relation to the altercation, and subsequent disclosure of information. [16.4] He was dishonest in not providing information relating to the process of getting a section 35A permit, dealing with the Ombudsmen, and misleading regarding the role of people present at the altercation. Mr ITH’s response [17] Mr ITH provided a substantial amount of material from his file. Accordingly, it is possible to evaluate t...