Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 052 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...Report) at section 3. 6 [15] The Decisions Report granted the following resource consents of relevance to the appeals:9 (a) APP-2005011178.01 and APP-2018201909.00 - Eketahuna Wastewater Treatment Plant General Conditions Applying to all Permits, expiring seven years after commencement; (b) ATH-2013010987.01 - Eketahuna Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharge to Water Permit; (c) ATH-2015200247.00 and ATH-2018202081.00 Eketahuna Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharge to Land Pe...

2. Rotorua District Council (Representation Arrangements) Bill [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...7 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7. 5 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND Published by Order of the House of Representatives – 2022 22.3 The spirit, intent and generosity of Ngāti Whakaue as provided in the Rotorua Township (Fenton) Agreement (which permitted establishment of the Rotorua Township with the approval of Ngāti Whakaue); 22.4 The need to guarantee Māori representation at the decision-making table, to ensure mana whenua can inform decisions being made by the Council. 23. T...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 011 Reuters Construction Ltd v Whanganui District Council [pdf, 770 KB]

   ...[which relates to flood hazards and prohibits alteration of ... the existing ground level in a manner that diverts flood flows or adversely affects channel capacity] means the level of ground when the subject allotmentls were created, and any works permitted by a Building Consent to establish building foundations. In relation to Building Height existing ground level means the level of the ground immediately preceding any earthworks for the development of a new building platform. The...

4. McNie v CAC2004 & Proude [2013] NZREADT 49 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...that a hearing before us is a “proceeding”; see ss.105, 106, 109 and 113 of the Act. In particular, s.109(5) refers to it as “judicial proceeding”. Counsel for the second respondent maintains that it would be an abuse of process for us to permit the present appeal to be heard, because the complaint which forms the basis of the appeal has already been settled and the appellant has expressly agreed not to bring any further proceeding arising out of the settled claim against any pe...

5. Senadipathi & Xavier v Sampang [2015] NZIACDT 43 (20 April 2015) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...position was located. [6.2.1] Mr Sampang did not exercise due care, diligence, respect and professionalism, through his failure to ensure he met the requirements of the Immigration Instructions. [6.2.2] His advice after the application for the work permit was declined was wrong as: [6.2.2] When Immigration New Zealand notified Mr Sampang the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully, and had 42 days to lodge an appeal; he told her she had 14 days to re-apply for a visa. [6.2.2] He...

6. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - summary document - large print [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...Copyright (Marrakesh Treaty Implementation) Amendment Act 2019. It is for your own personal use and cannot be shared with anyone else. The author and publisher reserve the right to take legal action if the Act is breached. No unauthorised copying is permitted. Produced 2021 by Accessible Formats Service, Blind Low Vision NZ, Auckland Total print pages: 8 Total large print pages: 15 Additional Publishing Information This large print edition is a transcription of...

7. [2007] NZEmpC CC 27/07 South Tranz Ltd & Ors v Strait Freight Ltd [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...s151. Where, as in this case, the term of the agreement which is found to have been broken does not require the payment of money, the only remedy available to the Authority is to order compliance with the term in question. No other remedies are permitted under s151 and the effect of s149(3)(b) is that the agreement may not be the subject of any form of proceedings other then enforcement proceedings. A compliance order is an order made under s137 and is limited to an order of the...

8. Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2016] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...justice would be hollow if barriers prevented parties from gaining that access. [6.4] Although the grounds on which an agency may properly refuse to disclose personal information requested by an individual under Principle 6 are limited to those permitted by ss 27 to 29, the effect of those provisions is that such information can indeed be lawfully withheld. Without the independent oversight of the Tribunal an individual in such a case would have no means of testing the decision or of o...

9. Randell - Omahu 4C4 (2020 ) 86 Takitimu MB 219 (86 TKT 219) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...Randell had been abusive to the previous lessee of the trust land and had also abused his fellow trustees from time to time. [3] She also claimed that Mr Randell had caused loss to the trust by driving off the previous lessee, Richard Thompson, permitting thistle regrowth and by his actions, in effect, depriving the trust of income. Ms Thompson contended that the only sensible outcome was for Mr Randell to be removed as a trustee. In her submissions, Ms Thompson was supported...

10. 2021-02-22 Special Advisor (Ian Gordon) - submission on Willowridge s 281 application [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...In its Notice and subsequent memoranda, Willowridge states: a. it applies under s 274(1)(d); b. it is not a trade competitor for the purpose of s 308A; c. its proposed joinder is confined to its interests in two proposed rules in relation to permitted and restricted discretionary earthworks (rules 14.5.1 and 14.5.2, together the Rules) and that it supports the deletion of those Rules; and d. it has an interest in the proceedings greater than that of the general public. 6. Willo...