Search Results

1. Hemi – Te Pupuke E1G1A (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 151 (60 TTK 151) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...1A (“the land”). [2] The sole ground for the application is that the applicants believe that their rates liability to the Far North District Council (“the Council”) will decrease if the occupation orders are cancelled and replaced by licences to occupy (or what the Council terms “occupation licences”). The application raises two issues. [3] First, whether the applicants are in fact correct that their rates liability will decrease if the occupation orders are replaced...

2. Calder v Bharani [2017] NZIACDT 12 (4 August 2017) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...grounds on which the complaint was upheld involved fundamental non-compliance with some elementary aspects of professional practice. However, it is important to recognise that Mr Bharani had not undergone the standard training required to obtain a licence, and he was inexperienced. Furthermore, his primary expertise was as a practitioner in Australia, rather than New Zealand. It appeared he lacked the mentoring and supervision that would have been beneficial to him at that point i...

3. LCRO 126/2013 MZ v JK [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...said that although the Body Corporate had not received any notice that any proceedings were pending against it, there “is communication relating to a possible dispute over access to Lot 4”. [5] BCSL said the Body Corporate was offering a licence to parking spot 8, apparently at [address]. It appears BCSL provided Mr JK with some information about the dispute mentioned in the Certificate, although it is not entirely clear what that information was, or how complete or accurate...

4. Penalty CAC 10020 v McDonald [2014] NZREADT 29 [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...interim decision on penalty which was subject to our providing reasons for our penalty orders. [6] We then noted that it was difficult to argue against the submission for the prosecution that the defendant’s offending required cancellation of her licence. However, we stated that having analysed all the detailed factors put to us by counsel that day, and in prior written submissions, perhaps we could regard this particular situation of the defendant’s as borderline in terms of whet...

5. PSPLA Protocol 12 September 2022 [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...Personnel Licensing Authority Protocols 1. These guidelines replace all previous Covid protocols and will apply to the Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority while Covid is in the community. 2. The PSPLA will process all applications for licences and certificates and deal with complaints against all licence and certificate holders in its usual manner and in accordance with statutory guidelines but with the following conditions: • In person hearings will resume but...

6. 2024 NZPSPLA 086.pdf [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...[2] A subsequent complaint was filed by Gary Morison of the NZ Security Association. Mr Morrison alleges Mr Rooney has breached the Act by carrying on a guarding business at the Lylo Hostel under the name of RooneySec Elite without an individual licence and while his COA was suspended. [3] Mr Rooney says that as the theft charge has been withdrawn the police complaint against him should also be withdrawn and his COA reinstated. He denies that he has been working in security while his...

7. McGeorge v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 70 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...separate bank account, and did not do so. He has not accounted for this money. It is simple misappropriation of trust funds. He has offered no explanation, justification or excuse. [17] Mr Standing is no longer a licensed immigration adviser, as his licence was cancelled by this Tribunal with effect from 15 August 2011. That was due to professional misconduct. However, that complaint was less serious than the misconduct disclosed in the present series of complaints. When his licenc...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 9 - DKD v Smith - Sanctions (13 February 2020) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...upholding the complaint and will only be briefly summarised here. [4] Mr Gregory Francisco Smith was at the relevant time a licensed immigration adviser based in Auckland. He was a director of Impact Migration Services Ltd. A renewal of his licence was refused by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar), the head of the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority), on 20 October 2015. [5] The complainant, a national of South Africa, had been living in New Zealand...

9. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 29 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...Auckland, and consulted the Adviser. [2.2] The Adviser told the Complainants specific employment positions were available in Marlborough. She presented employment contracts, and had them executed by the Complainants. [2.3] The Adviser applied for work permits on the basis of the positions of employment. [2.4] The Adviser was either indifferent as to whether the positions were available, or knew they were not. She made no proper inquiries, despite presenting the employment contracts to...

10. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 84 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...respect of five previous complaints, separate from the nine now under consideration. The previous complaints resulted in her being censured, ordered to pay financial penalties, refund fees, and pay compensation. Furthermore, the Tribunal cancelled her licence and restricted her to applying for a provisional licence for a two-year period, which would require her to practise only under supervision. [11] The present series of complaints involve findings of failing to initiate professional re...