Search Results

1. BORA Criminal Proceeds and Instruments Bill [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...provision in Part 2 for the making of the following types of orders: 4.1 Restraining orders (clauses 24 to 26), which have the effect of restraining the person subject to the order from dealing with the property other than provided for in the order, and permitting the Official Assignee to take control and custody of the property. Restraining orders are temporary and are intended to preserve the property pending determination of an application for forfeiture. 4.2 Assets forfeiture order...

2. LCRO 240/2017 O & B HN v JJ Lawyers (22 June 2018) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...advance to Mr FT, trading as [LV] Law Specialists, for employment dispute services for Mrs HN which they say were never performed. [3] In their complaint, they submitted that [JJL] should be ordered to compensate them in that amount because, by permitting Mr FT to use a room in or adjacent to their office premises that was not differentiated from those by signage or otherwise, they “let him pass as a member of their firm”. [4] For reasons I will set out in due course, a money c...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 64 Max Pennington Motors Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 253 KB]

   MAX PENNINGTON MOTORS LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2020] NZEmpC 64 [15 May 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 64 EMPC 178/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MAX PENNINGTON MOTORS LIMITED Plaintiff AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR, MINIST

4. Quaife – Part Whakapoungakau 1B3G Roadway (2015) 127 Waiariki MB 171 (127 WAR 171) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...(b) The applicants own land in general title, being Lot 2 DPS 9908 (SA9D/351), which adjoins the roadway block and has existing legal frontage following a previous subdivision; (c) The applicants wish to have legal frontage to Glenroy Place, to permit future subdivision of one new house site on their land; and (d) In order to facilitate a subdivision, both the owners and the Rotorua District Council require a small section of the existing roadway block to become a public road. [...

5. BORA Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Bill [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...provision in Part 2 for the making of the following types of orders: 4.1 Restraining orders (clauses 24 to 26), which have the effect of restraining the person subject to the order from dealing with the property other than provided for in the order, and permitting the Official Assignee to take control and custody of the property. Restraining orders are temporary and are intended to preserve the property pending determination of an application for forfeiture. 4.2 Assets forfeiture order...

6. [2022] NZACC 129 – McInnes v ACC (4 July 2022) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...hypertension. Nor could they think of a plausible biological mechanism by which the inhalation or absorption of that agent might cause that disease. In the panel’s view, the evidence presented by Dr Burling is not strong or consistent enough to permit a reasonable inference ACR 132/20 of cause. The consensus was that Mr McInnes’ hypertension was less likely than not to be the result of past chemical exposure… [68] Ms Becroft noted that the evidence of Mr Christiansen, i...

7. Evans - Tokata A15 (2004) 68 Ruatōria MB 131 (68 RUA 131) [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...Panui No: 17 Application Nos: A20030005204 & A20030007204 Subject: Section: Counsel: Introduction Tokata A15 135, 136/93 & 338/93 Mr Taite RESERVED DECISION This case is basically about whether the Court should grant an order permitting the change of status of Tokata A 15 from Maori freehold land to General land, despite the objections from a number of people associated in accordance with tikanga Maori to the land. It is also about whether the Court should grant...

8. Loach v Bidois - Matarikoriko No 7B2A - (2013) 312 Aotea MB 195 (312 AOT 195) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...freehold land or the whole interest, not an undivided interest. In other words, the Act provides greater flexibility for the alienation of a whole block compared with undivided interests, by giving the preferred class a right of first refusal but then permitting alienation outside of the class of the whole block. With undivided interests, alienation is restricted to the preferred class. (Emphasis added) [26] In my assessment, having carefully considered the evidence and submiss...

9. [2024] NZREADT 14 - EH & E Ltd v CAC 2204 & C Ltd (6 May 2024) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...not give express permission to release the deposits, but it is not correct that he told the agency not to release them (until well after they were released). What the solicitor did was to sign the confirmation forms for both properties, which permitted the agency under cl 2.4 to release the deposits. [58] In his email of 3 August 2021 to the agency providing the signed confirmation form for property 100, the solicitor did not reserve the purchaser’s position on releasing the de...

10. Handisides v CAC 10030 & Cruden [2011] NZREADT 36 [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...and information about the power supply which could be generated from the stream. [2] The advertisement is central to this case and reads “40 hectares of tiger country: 40.662 hectares just 10 kilometres of easy drive from Takaka; Non permitted hunters cottage on level two acre (approx) site with good access; Permanent stream capable of up to 8 kw per day power generation; Excellent hunting at your doorstep; Borders Kahurangi National Park; Covered in esta...