7456 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 500 APPLICANT SP RESPONDENT GC Ltd The Tribunal orders: GC Ltd is to pay SP $3,029.00 on or before 26 July 2024. Reasons: 1. In 2016 SP purchased a property, including a new build house, from GC Ltd. SP says that in February 2024 there was a leak from the ceiling in one of the bedrooms. He says the leak is caused by a defect in the
...that it was current at the time he made his booking. That is especially true given at the time he booked in 2022, government requirements and restrictions around Covid and around policies such as masking, vaccination requirements, vaccine passes and permitted limits for gatherings were changing rapidly. I accept IF Ltd’s submission that at all times its communication and messages to its customers was that it would follow the regulations and requirements of the Ministry of Health. 1...
...thereof, in person. [18] The application is consented to by the parties and the other intervener, the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions. [19] Section 7 of the Courts (Remote Participation) Act 2010 provides the Court with discretion to permit appearance by AVL in accordance with the criteria in s 5 and taking into account whether the parties’ consent. Section 5 of that Act states: 5 General criteria for allowing use of audio-visual links A judicial officer or Registrar mu...
...additional term of the contract that the purchase price was reduced due to the likelihood of the imminent failure of the septic tank system and the potential issues NB was alerted to. 17. Clause 7 also provides that where the vendor has caused or permitted work to be done, they have obtained the required consents. CF and MF agreed that they had removed the bath and substituted a shower, but said all the existing waste water pipes remained exactly as they were. NB did not provide ev...
...is because it knew he had read the email and the usual action of someone receiving confirmation of a booking that they have solicited, if they did not want that booking, is to contact the other party to advise them of that. By not doing that NG had permitted U Ltd to rely on his silence and allocate its resource to his job. While NG may not have read that email/not read it properly, U Ltd could reasonably have assumed that he had done so. c. I find that the terms were sufficiently cer...
...of $20,000 for an individual or otherwise $200,000; 6 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1 (SC) at [162] per Blanchard J. 7 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [26] and [27] per Elias J. b. discharging trade waste without a permit, with a maximum fine of $500,000 for an individual or otherwise $3,000,000; c. connecting to, disconnecting from, or discharging materials into a stormwater network without authorisation, with a maximum fine of $50,000 for an individual...
...should be provided through Te Au Reka. • Submitters also: o noted that the process for authorising and terminating information access needed to be carefully managed o asked whether ‘supervised access’ to court information as currently permitted in the rules could occur through the use of technology, without a court officer being present, and o suggested that information access rights through the ordinary course of proceedings needed to be clear compared with access under...
...interests of justice to deprive the defendant of the fruits of their success. If a stay were to be granted, the defendant would lose the opportunity to use the money which the Authority ordered to be paid to them, while the plaintiff would be permitted to continue to trade profitably and unaffected by the awards. I am satisfied that the balance of convenience favours the defendant. Outcome [26] Weighing up these factors, the overall interests of justice are met by declining the...
...motion for a secret ballot was passed. Once the nominations had been finalised, the voting process was then explained to those in attendance, and voting papers were distributed. [16] Under clause 7(d)(ix) of the Terms of trust, voting by proxy is permitted. 329 Waiariki MB 221 [17] During the meeting, issues were raised regarding the proxy votes, as there were some irregularities regarding some of the proxies and concerns about block voting. The matter was discussed, and the m...
...to the MMEMP are to be made in accordance with the amendment process set out in the MMEMP, that process now being explicitly included in the MMEMP. (b) Waikato Regional Council consent conditions: Resource consent AUTH144475.03.01 (Discharge permit – water – stormwater) (i) Condition 23 (Adverse event notification) – This condition has been amended to include TKMT and WWT as parties to be notified in respect of specific adverse events affecting water quality and to corre...