Brown v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Slicker [2018] NZREADT 68 [pdf, 174 KB]
...third party who had an acquaintance whose daughter was allegedly told by Mr Slicker that he could not show her the property because there was “a difficult tenant and dogs”. The Committee accepted Mr Slicker’s evidence that he had not been permitted to show interested parties through the property. The Committee found that, looked at objectively, there was no evidence to substantiate Ms Brown’s assertion that Mr Slicker had fobbed off potential purchasers. [8] The Committee...