[2021] NZEnvC 101 Close v Wellington City Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]
...Space B under the District Plan. The planning "vitnesses (Mr T Anderson for WZAL and Mr P N Thomas for the Appellants) agreed that the proposal required consent as a discretionary activity because the proposed platform structures exceeded permitted activity standards. The zipline activity itself ( considered in isolation) would be permitted as a recreation activity was it not for the non-compliance of the platforms and the fact that operation of the zipline would exceed a permi...