Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 257 Waikato District Council v Bushell [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Respondent consented via email on 10 December 2022 to the removal of the stockpile of earth on 24 Heather Green Avenue, provided that there is no damage to the property in the process. Accordingly, the Council advises that it no longer seeks an order to permit such removal given the Third Respondent’s consent. The parties also advise that agreement has not been reached in respect [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 5 of the costs of the investigation and monitoring of adverse effe...

2. INZ (Gilray) v Singh [2019] NZIACDT 53 (29 July 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...their questions from the staff at the consultancy. However, he did not believe there was clear evidence that the clients received unlicensed immigration advice. The consultancy’s staff had confirmed in writing that they understood they were not permitted to do so and that they had not given immigration advice to the clients. [32] According to Mr Singh, any breach of cl 1 was inadvertent. Having accepted a lack of due care in regard to cl 1, Mr Singh also acknowledged that thi...

3. AJ v Secretary for Justice 4 August 2012 NZRA 000010 [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...respect of (a) in para 9 he was Counsel assisting in 2 matters and was lead counsel in respect of the 3rd matter. b. In respect of the requirement of “substantial and active involvement in at least 3 trials, he submitted that the Secretary is not permitted to arbitrarily narrow the term down to courtroom activity and that reg 6(2) requires a more holistic approach. In addition to being satisfied about the experience and competence requirement in the Schedule to the Regulations,...

4. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2005) 154 Aotea MB 96 (154 AOT 96) [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...generations of Muaupoko must demand this of their leaders, lest the pathway to eventual resolution forever remain elusive. The critical point here is that while litigants are entitled to have their applications determined according to law, I will not permit the Court to be used in a manner that may lead to an abuse of process. Decision Having carefully considered the material before the Court, for the reasons stated the application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. this :2.-, n-...

5. [2006] NZEmpC CC 2A/06 Rawlings v Sanco NZ Ltd [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...challenge by hearing de novo in Telecom New Zealand Ltd v Nutter [2004] 1 ERNZ 315, para [2]. [13] As to the scope of the challenge, this is a matter of determining what issues may be put before the Court and the extent of evidence that may be permitted to be called about these issues. [14] Each of the three issues on which the Authority relied to dismiss the grievance ought fairly to be within the scope of the challenge. These are the compliance with the 90-day issue, whether s1...

6. Boyce v Westpac NZ Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...privacy principles because: [6.1] Disclosure of the information was one of the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained or was directly related to the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained and therefore permitted by Principle 11(a); or [6.2] Disclosure of the statement was impliedly authorised by Mr Boyce and therefore permitted by Principle 11(d). [7] In the background to this case there are employment issues between Mr Boyce and Stret...

7. Uatahausi v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 32 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...Immigration Advisers Authority referred this complaint to the Tribunal. [2] The complaint arose when Mr Hakaoro accepted instructions to assist the complainants with a request for a visa; they wished to remain in New Zealand after their temporary permits expired. The circumstances alleged are that: [2.1] Immigration New Zealand identified why the complainants could not remain in New Zealand beyond the 9 months allowed. Mr Hakaoro told them they could expect to apply successfully to ren...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Chambers [2022] NZLCDT 53 (23 December 2022) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...awarded, as is mandatory, against the New Zealand Law Society. This decision provides the reasons for dismissal. Nature of the charge and brief background [2] Mr Chambers was originally charged with misconduct, alleging that he had dumped, or permitted the dumping of client and other documents in a skip on a construction site in July 2020. [3] After Mr Chambers provided evidence that he had been out of New Zealand when this dumping occurred, the Standards Committee withdrew t...

9. Justice-Factsheet-for-claimant-funding-for-Tuapapa-Stage.pdf [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...• Accommodation Flights: If there are no available seats on flights, we will let you know and you may wish to think about a different form of travel. Driving: We can make rental car bookings if the driver has a full license and is legally permitted to drive. The Ministry will not be liable for the costs of any damage caused or fines incurred during travel, including costs of any damage or fines involving use of rental cars. Taxi/Shuttles: We can also provide taxi chits and p...

10. 2017 NZSSAA 048 (18 August 2017) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...CDA (or any other matter). [3] The Ministry accepts there was no reason for the appellant to be aware she was entitled to a CDA at an earlier point in time, and that as soon she did became of her entitlement she took action. [4] If the law permits the Chief Executive to do so, he is willing to commence payment of the CDA from the point of diagnosis, and potentially earlier if an earlier entitlement was established. [5] There is only one issue in dispute. The appellant wants the...