Search Results

1. 2021-07-05 Nga Runanga - Closing Submissions [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...effects on values of importance to Ngā Rūnanga. The direction it provides for decision-making inappropriately prioritises consumptive use over instream values and it does not give consideration to cumulative effects. (b) It is clear that if permits continue to be granted under the current planning framework for timeframes of up to 35 years, this will undermine the new regional planning framework and limit its ability to give effect to the NPSFM. (c) Long term water allocation...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 142 Waimakariri District Council [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...Rural Zone. Under the operative Plan, the minimum lot size for subdivision and residential development in the Rural Zone is 4 ha. Subdivision down to this size is a controlled activity. Construction of a Residential Unit (at this density) is permitted, as is a Minor Residential Unit. The 4 ha threshold has been operative since 2005.4 [6] The proposed plan would split the operative Rural Zone into two new rural zones: first, the proposed Rural Lifestyle Zone and second, the propo...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 021 Regina Properties Ltd v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 611 KB]

   ...not been confirmed but neutral colours are indicated I was advised that proposal proposes a maximum building height of 15.4 metres above existing ground level ,vithin Lot 1 DP 19148 and therefore a maximum infringement of 5.4 metres above the permitted 10 metre height limit for the zone. However, and as the site is not unifo1m, differing height infringements occur at various of the site. The existing consented GQ building is approximately 1.7 metres higher than the 10-metre height...

4. [2010] NZEmpC 62 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...of the Act. It does not follow, therefore as Mr Malone contended, that as s 5 (2005) 7 NZELC 97,995. 6 [1998] 1 ERNZ 462. 7 [1998] 3 ERNZ 629. 8 CA43/07, 12 April 2007. 67 of the Act permits expressly parties to agree to probationary arrangements, it is not possible in law for a collective agreement to prohibit such, whether expressly or certainly by implication. If s 67 had required all employment agreements to contain...

5. E71 Keith Ingram - EIC - Tug William C Daldy [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...from both the community and businesses alike. Auckland Council is one such sponsor of whom we have a license to occupy ‘Heads of Agreement’ via Waterfront Auckland now ‘Panuku’, to use our current berth on Hobson West. In doing so we are permitted under the Auckland Plan to raise steam and operate as a heritage, coal burning steam tug on Auckland’s Harbour from our berth at Hobson West. We raise this, only to point out that both the Society and the ship we believe, are not ob...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 028 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [pdf, 990 KB]

   ...Institute of Acoustics, or Acoustical Society of New Zealand) shall be provided to the CCMO. The report shall: • Compare the measured noise levels with the predicted noise levels provided with the application. • Should the operation exceed the permitted standards with respect the external boundaries of the site, the zipline shall cease operations and apply measures to make it comply. • Comment on compliance with condition {10) above, based on noise measurements undertaken in...

7. HNL v SEC [2013] NZIACDT 11 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...to sponsor his wife. Accordingly, an application could only proceed once Mr HNL had been issued with a residence visa. Mr HNL said he would lodge his own residence application. [16.5] Mr SEC then said Mr HNL’s fiancée could apply for a work permit, and he took the initial details for an application. [16.6] Mr SEC provided written notes to Mr HNL that explained the information required to complete the application for a work permit. [17] Mr SEC explained his approach to this profe...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 265 Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...run-off (including phosphorus, sediments and potentially microbial contaminants). [8] Given the foregoing, it is the court’s preliminary view that it does not have jurisdiction under s 70 of the Resource Management Act 1991 to approve of a rule permitting the discharge of contaminants incidental to farming activities. [9] All parties are agreed on the use of Farm Environmental Management Plans as the key method for giving effect to the proposed plan’s policies and objectives....

9. 2020-07-06-ORC-Proposed-Plan-Change-8-Water-Quality.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...stormwater; and (b) Measures to prevent contamination of the receiving environment by industrial or trade waste; and (c) The use of techniques to trap debris, sediments and nutrients present in runoff. Explanation In terms of the Plan’s rules for permitted and discretionary activities for new discharges, or extensions to the catchment area of existing discharges from reticulated stormwater systems, the requirements of (a) to (c) will apply, as required. Principal reasons f...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 101 Otago Regional Council - Urban Provisions [pdf, 1.9 MB]

    ...contains the rules managing discharges. Section 12.A of the RPW contains a series of rules managing discharges of human sewage from different sources: (a) discharges of human sewage from long-drop toilets and onsite wastewater treatment systems are permitted with conditions under Rules 12.A.1.1 to 12.A.1.4; and (b) discharges of human sewage from other sources, and those which do not meet the conditions of the permitted activity rules, require resource consent as a discretionar...