CAC20009 v Li [2015] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 212 KB]
...2007-404-1818; Lang J; 13/8/07 7 11.4 Where appropriate, rehabilitation of the agent must be considered – see B v B3. [9] The facts illustrate such a serious breach of the obligations of an agent that suspension or cancellation of Mr Li’s licence is an appropriate penalty. Counsel for Mr Li recognised this. Suspension or Cancellation? 2. The Courts have provided some guidance to the Tribunal in other professional regulatory bodies. In Patel v Dentists Disciplinar...