Search Results

1. Rātima v Sullivan - Tataraakina C Trust (2017) 64 Tākitimu MB 121 (64 TKT 121) [pdf, 874 KB]

   ............................................................................................... [102] Discussion ........................................................................................................................ [109] Should the earlier Poronui licence findings be re-visited? .......................................... [115] Are the former trustees entitled to indemnity for any costs paid in their defence? .. [117] Applicant’s submissions .................................

2. [2023] NZEnvC 259 Dromgool v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 493 KB]

   ...lines, wires, cranes, drilling rigs, Vehicles, plant, tools and machinery and all material and items required for the purpose of exercising any of the rights under this Easement; 1.1.6 “Grantee” means Top Energy Limited, its successors and permitted transferees, assigns, lessees, sublessees and licensees together with the Grantee’s servants, agents, employees, workers, invitees, licensees and contractors with or without vehicles, machinery or equipment. 1.1.7 “Grantor” m...

3. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...JUDGE BORTHWICK ........................................................... 1244 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1251 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1253 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ..............................................................................................

4. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...JUDGE BORTHWICK ........................................................... 1244 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1251 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1253 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ..............................................................................................

5. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   .......................................................................................................... 1242 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1243 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1254 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ...................................................................

6. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...JUDGE BORTHWICK ........................................................... 1244 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1251 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1253 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ..............................................................................................

7. 2021-03-11 Nga Runanga - opening submissions [pdf, 443 KB]

   ...needs of water bodies have been largely ignored. 7. Water abstraction in Otago is characterised by heavy allocation pressure on some water bodies and by increasing demand. The pressure on water bodies is exacerbated by the continuance of deemed permits that are exempt from regulation until their expiry in October this year. The rights attaching to these permits have become more entrenched over the same period that Ngā Rūnanga have experienced the loss of their economic and spir...

8. Federated Farmers of New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 425 KB]

   .......with low risk of diffuse discharge”. Although that term is not defined, the way it is applied through rules seems to ignore the cumulative impact of many supposedly “low intensity farms”. The policy aims to provide the foundation for permitted activity rules and needs to better target the activities that are genuinely low risk, both individually and Amend Policy 1 as follows: c. Enabling, through permitted activity rules, low intensity farming and horticultural acti...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 211 Panuku Development Auckland Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...removal to a consented disposal site is not required. 131. Any perched groundwater, or surface water encountered within the excavation area requiring removal shall be considered potentially contaminated, and shall either: (a) be disposed of by a licenced liquid waste contractor; or (b) pumped to sewer, providing the relevant permits are obtained; or (c) discharged to the stormwater system or surface waters provided testing demonstrates compliance with the Australian and New Zealand En...

10. Privacy

    ...personal information sent overseas is protected by comparable privacy standards. The Act also clarifies that when a New Zealand agency engages an overseas service provider, it will have to comply with New Zealand privacy laws. Class actions: The Act permits class actions in the Human Rights Review Tribunal by persons other than the Director of Human Rights Proceedings. New criminal offences: It will be an offence to mislead an agency in a way that affects someone else’s information, and to de...

    Located in:

    1. Justice sector & policy >
    2. Key initiatives >
    3. Key initiatives archive