Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 105 Doig v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...working days of the date of this decision . Any reply is to be made within a further five working days. For the court: J J M Hassan Environment Judge Annexure 1: 1. Finalised conditions. Annexure 1 Resource Consent U161037 A coastal permit to authorise foreshore structures fronting Lot 1 DP 433122 in Milton Bay comprising: a floating jetty and linkspan; a two storey boatshed; a boat launching ramp; a seawall, steps and decking, as modified by the following conditions: 1....

2. BORA Trade Marks (International Treaties And Enforcement) Amendment Bill [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...can be reasonable under the circumstances. Sections 134D and 134E balance these exigencies against the rights of individuals to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures. The provisions limit searches to those places where the public is permitted. The provisions limit seizures only to items found in parts of the place open to the public and to situations where a reasonable belief exists that the items are evidence of an offence. Further, no search or seizure is conducted wit...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 234 Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 987 KB]

   ...passing across a Significant Wetland. 6. Amend Rules 2.11.4, 2.11.5, 3.7.3, 3.7.4, 4.7.4 and 4.7.5 to read, as follows: [R] 2.11.4. Other than stock exclusion required by the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020, From 9 June 2022, permitting intensively farmed livestock to enter onto: (a) the bed of a lake; or (b) or the bed of a river when there is water flowing in the river, unless the stock are supervised and actively driven across the river, and do not cross...

4. 2021-03-14 Alexandra King - Evidence [pdf, 248 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA...

5. Brown v New Zealand Post Ltd (Recusal Application) [2016] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...no application connected or related to his affidavit because in his opinion he had filed enough documentation and there was no need for anything further to be filed. He continued to repeat the phrase that the Chairperson was not morally or legally permitted to be involved in any of his proceedings. [15] As to the application by NZ Post for particulars, Mr Brown said this application was “rubbish” and that his claim was clear, lucid and concrete. In response to a question from the...

6. Manuel v Carroll - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 5004 Part Waimarama 3A1A1 (2020) 83 Takitimu MB 41(83 TKT 41) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...submissions [9] Mr Bidois, counsel for the applicant, filed detailed written submissions. He contended that Mr Carroll is neither an owner nor a whanaunga of one. Between October 2002 and October 2017, Mr Carroll occupied the land under a bare licence on the condition that he mow the lawns, pay the rates, and generally keep the property tidy and in good order. On 28 April 2017, Ms Manuel revoked that licence and requested that Mr Carroll vacate the land by 30 August 2017. A furthe...

7. [2023] NZIACDT 8 - BC v Murthy (22 March 2023) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...fourth complaint upheld against Ms Murthy. Consideration will be given to the suspension or cancellation of Ms Murthy’s licence and/or an order preventing her from reapplying for a licence for a period. This could be accompanied by a condition permitting Ms Murthy to hold a provisional licence and requiring her to be supervised. Submissions from the parties are expressly invited on such options. Ms Murthy should inform the Tribunal of any proposal for supervision, including the...

8. REAA CAC 10017 v Miller [2014] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...s.172 of the 2008 Act applies. Given that s.172 allows us to impose only penalties that would have been available under the Real Estate Agents Act 1976, the penalty options available to us are limited to cancellation or suspension of Mr Miller’s licence and/or a financial penalty of no more than $750. [3] If we consider imposing orders for cancellation or suspension under s.172 of the 2008 Act, we are required to consider the “character test” applicable under the 1976 2...

9. MacDonald v MacDonald - Wairau Block XII Section 6C 2C (2021) 69 Te Waipounamu MB 251 (69 TWP 251) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...irrigation, Phillip similarly said he would accept the risk this may not be able to be obtained, but said it is not required anyway and regardless he is confident it can be achieved. He said he has intervened in Brigham’s application to renew the water licence for the front part of the block and submits Brigham’s attempts to cut him off are opportunistic, vindictive and unfair. 6 As discussed at para [7] of this judgment. 69 Te Waipounamu MB 256 [20] Phillip disagre...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 25 - EM v Ma (25 October 2024) [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...Licensing Act 2007 (Act). BACKGROUND [3] Tzu-Tong Jane Ma was at the relevant time a self-employed licensed immigration adviser, who traded under her own name or Colab Ltd or New Zealand Immigration Concepts. She was based in Auckland. Her licence was suspended by the Tribunal effective 2 April 2024, for the reasons given in the notice. Her business address is now Colab in Taoyuan, China.1 [4] The complainant is EM, a national of China. [5] On 1 March 2023, an immigrati...