Search Results

1. Wang v Fu [2016] NZIACDT 38 (8 August 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...address the complaint in a sensible manner. [9] The Tribunal issued Directions on 5 May 2016. They pointed out to Mr Fu: [9.1] He was facing a serious professional disciplinary complaint, which included dishonesty. It was in a category where his licence is in issue if the Tribunal upheld the complaint. [9.2] The complainant’s response, which pointed out the inadequacy of Mr Fu’s response, potentially had merit. [9.3] The Tribunal would schedule an oral hearing where Mr Fu could pr...

2. WVU v Real Estate Agents Authority Jurisdiction Objection [2014] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...Background [1] In 2013 the plaintiff entered a plea of guilty to a charge of misconduct brought before the Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal under s 73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. As a consequence he was fined $1,500 and his licence cancelled for six months. 2 See Real Estate Agents Authority v Mr D [2013] NZREADT 23. In a subsequent decision given on 10 May 2013 a non-publication order was made suppressing the plaintiff’s name and any details likely to id...

3. [2021] NZIACDT 13 - TI v Malcolm (8 June 2021) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...the disciplinary process. He has offered no explanation to either the Authority or the Tribunal. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Timothy James Malcolm is a former licensed immigration adviser. He practised under the name TM Immigration, in Auckland. His licence expired on 3 February 2021. [5] The complainant is TI, a national of Germany. She arrived in New Zealand in 2015 and worked as a teacher on temporary work visas from 2016. At the relevant time, her visa was due to expire on 11...

4. Tau - Kaiapoi Section 149B (2020) 62 Te Waipounamu MB 169 (62 TWP 169) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...frustrated the intent of the Reserve leading to the decline of the Māori community at Tuahiwi. In particular, he highlighted the re-zoning of the Reserve as Rural land under the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The result was that only one house was permitted for every 10 acres and whānau could no longer give their children land to build on. This inability to build on Reserve land led to the acceleration of Tuahiwi whānau relocating to the cities during the 1970s and 1980s and...

5. 2023 NZPSPLA 076 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...done so to the Authority. Other [41] A further issue was dealt with separately but is relevant to note in this decision for clarity and public education. On some official documentation of Argyle’s the following emblem was included: [42] Licence holders are not authorised to use the Ministry of Justice logo. In fact, no one is permitted to use the Ministry of Justice Logo without authorisation. In addition, it is legally wrong, as the Private Security Personnel Licensing Auth...

6. Gudgeon - Lot 46 Deposited Plan 8163 Māori Reservation (Nga Pakiaka ki te Iwi Marae) (2016) 54 Takitimu MB 164 (54 TKT 164) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...comprised within a Māori reservation shall, while the reservation subsists, be inalienable, whether to the Crown or to any other person. [12] Pursuant to s 338(12) trustees are able, with the consent of the Court, to grant a lease or occupation licence of the reservation or of any part of it for any term not exceeding 14 years (including any term or terms of renewal), upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the court thinks fit. In addition, any lease granted pursuant t...

7. Bidois v Trustees of Te Rimu Trust - Tokata A14 and other blocks (2013) 31 Tarawhiti MB 95 (31 TRW 95) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...the lease. [2] The applicants also raise various concerns as to the administration of the Trust including issues over proper process, the future use and development of the land, the rights of beneficial owners, proposals for owners to receive a licence of the land and related matters. [3] Richard Clarke, the chairperson of the Trust, says that while the trustees would strongly prefer that the issues be resolved between the trustees, both he and Hepa Akuhata Brown do not 31 Taira...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 259 Williams v Nelson City Council [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...as follows: The hedge along the south property boundary Flat 2 DP 17983, Pt Sec 1085 SO 112 283A Rutherford Street, Nelson [5] The notice gave the following reasons: The hedge along the south boundary of 283A Rutherford Street exceeds the permitted height of 1.8 metres. The hedge must be pruned to comply with the relevant rule, or a resource consent must be sought to authorise the non- compliance. [6] In those and other respects, the abatement notice accords with relevant RMA...

9. Musese v Min [2013] NZIACDT 24 (04 April 2013) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...assigned this file along with 10 other New Zealand applications from the South African office. [20.3] On 14 September 2011, Mr Min was reviewing the file and was having difficulty identifying what timeframe would apply. Mr Min was concerned that a work permit was required, as residence (which had been the approach taken) would take too long. [20.4] On 15 September 2011, Mr Min first made contact with Mr Musese by email. [20.5] On 17 September 2011, Mr Musese told Mr Min he was not sat...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

    ...the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, to engage with her client, the complainant, and also to do immigration work that only a licensed adviser is allowed to perform. Furthermore, that she was negligent in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The essential issue to consider is one of credibility, being whether Ms Hill was the effective author of all the te...