Search Results

1. Housing Corporation of New Zealand v Trustees of housing 1B3B2A– Waimanoni 1B3B2A (1996) 19 Kaitaia MB 227 (19 KT 227) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...(now Mrs Chan) as trustees. By memorandum dated the 3rd July 1987, the trustees granted Morgan Patrick Awarau a license to occupy that part of the land on the plan annexed to the document for a term of 30 years from the date of execution of the licence at a rental of $1.00 per annum. The license provided that the license "shall cease and determine (but without prejudice to the rights and powers of the lender under this Deed) if: ( 1) The House shall be removed from the Site, or...

2. Ratu v Marshall - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 115 (2023 APPEAL 115) [pdf, 383 KB]

   ...on the whenua to be removed. Mrs Marshall applied to the Māori Land Court to prevent this. On 12 August 2021, Judge Stone:1 (a) Determined that Mrs Marshall owns the homestead as far as it sits on the whenua; (b) Granted Mrs Marshall a licence to occupy that part of the whenua on which the house sits for her lifetime; and (c) Ordered her to pay compensation of $20,000 and damages for trespass of $1,000 to the trustees. [4] The trustees appeal. [5] Before hearing the s...

3. ASC - 2015 annual report [pdf, 828 KB]

   ...to see PHARMAC consider additional or alternative devices for funding at their next contract review. PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH The Abortion Supervisory Committee is a governance body that has a responsibility to ensure those we licence are undergoing appropriate ongoing professional education. During a certifying consultant’s annual reappointment process, we request information about the ongoing professional education they have completed. We continue to be im...

4. Retto v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 47 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Sands Migration (NZ) Limited] to act on his/her behalf with regard to [Mr Retto’s] application for Permanent Residency of New Zealand.” [12] Mr Standing was a party to the agreement, and identified as a licensed immigration adviser, with his licence number. Golden Sands Migration (NZ) Limited (Golden Sands) was the company through which Mr Standing conducted his practice as a licensed immigration adviser. [13] The professional fee for this service in the agreement was identified as...

5. Yerbury-Wilson v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 51 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...depends on their business being profitable or “clearly [having] the potential to be trading profitably within 12 months after the application is made”. They are concerned about the implications for them and their family. [17] Mr Standing had his licence cancelled by this Tribunal on 15 August 2011. Ms Yerbury-Wilson and Mr Wilson sought a refund of fees, including fees of $2,800 (it appears it should be £2,800 as Mr Standing’s invoice was for that amount, and that figure will be...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 51 - NMS v Mercardo (3 December 2020) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...[33] Mr Mercado now heads a company with 15 employees, including three other fully licensed advisers and two provisionally licensed advisers, all of whom rely upon his leadership. He has mentored four other provisional advisers who now hold full licences of their own. Mr Mercado himself has held a full licence since April 2009. [34] The Authority has proposed that Mr Mercado complete a training module, but Mr Laurent says that may not be required. The negligence largely arose fro...

7. Chowdhury v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 57 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...progressing Mr Chowdhury’s immigration objectives. [24] On 17 August 2011, Mr Standing wrote to Mr Chowdhury in a standard letter which appears to have been sent to his clients generally, as it was not personalised. It said Mr Standing had his licence cancelled by this Tribunal on 15 August 2011, and Living New Zealand Ltd (the company through which Mr Standing apparently operated his practice) had gone into liquidation. The letter suggested Mr Standing would continue to provide immig...

8. [2023] NZREADT 13 - CAC v Sun (9 June 2023) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...background facts are set out in the Tribunal’s substantive decision and are summarised below. [3] At the time of the relevant events, Ms Sun was a licensed salesperson under the Act working at [Real estate company]. Ms Sun voluntarily surrendered her licence on 25 October 2018 and is currently residing overseas. [4] In 2014, [Property development company] applied to [council] to subdivide a property into 15 lots (the subdivision). Each of the lots, to which this proceeding relat...

9. U v I [2018] NZIACDT 21 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...some other professions manage cases like this one. [3] I will take Mr I’s situation into account when deciding the complaint. He is not able to understand the complaint due to his health; family members have been cooperative, but they are not licenced immigration advisers. I am dealing with the complaint without any response from Mr I, but this is not due to any fault on his part. [4] The Registrar, as the Tribunal’s rules require, issued a notice of complaint. It sets out t...

10. [2021] NZREADT 21 - Kemp & Scoble (5 May 2021) [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...may be relevant to the present case, the Tribunal may: [a] make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may make under s 93 of the Act (following a finding of unsatisfactory conduct); [b] order cancellation of the licensee’s licence, or suspension for a period not exceeding 24 months; and/or [c] order a licensee to pay a fine of up to $15,000. Submissions [22] Ms Mok submitted for the Committee that penalty orders in disciplinary proceedings may ensure both sp...