Walker v Flight - Waipapa 1D 2B 3B (2016) 352 Aotea MB 211 (352 AOT 211) [pdf, 263 KB]
...Flight to remove the dwelling and associated improvements from Waipapa 1D 2B 3B. [19] Mr Koning argues that Mr Flight has occupied the site since 1987 without any formal permission from the trust. At best, he says, Mr Flight has an implied bare licence revocable by the trust at will and upon notice. Mr Koning submits that the bare licence did not require Mr Flight to pay any rental to the trust rather he was only required to pay the local council rates for the site....