Search Results

1. Evidence Brief: Alcohol Ignition Interlocks [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...continues after the devices are removed. • An alcohol interlock programme is currently delivered by the New Zealand Transport Agency. The programme requires the use of an interlock for a period of time before a disqualified drink driver’s licence is reinstated. The Department of Corrections provides funding for interlocks for certain offenders. • Low uptake and high cost of installation are the main limitations on the effectiveness of interlocks. Uptake is reduced by...

2. [2021] NZREADT 44 - Lawrence v Registrar of the Real Estate Authority (16 August 2021) [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...[7] Mrs Appleton submitted for the Registrar that s 112 of the Act is not intended to provide a right of review of a s 74(3) determination, and is intended to apply only to Registrar’s determinations relating to licensing, such as declining a licence application or cancelling an existing licence. She acknowledged that on its face, the language in s 112 is open to an interpretation that a Tribunal review is available for any Registrar’s determination. However, she submitted, a p...

3. Hohepa v Cassidy - Waima C30A and Waima Topu B (2018) 182 Taitokerau MB 166 (182 TTK 166) [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...the Waima Topu B Trust entered into the tripartite agreement with Pihema and Hiria Hohepa. Under that agreement, Housing New Zealand granted a loan to Pihema and Hiria to build the house, and the trustees of the Waima Topu B Trust granted them a licence to occupy the site for that house. The agreement, and the license, refer to the house being located on Waima Topu B. Pihema and Hiria have passed away. Pihema’s interests have been vested in the Pihema Whanau Trust. [12] In 200...

4. CAC 20003 v Fourie [2014]NZREADT 71 [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...prohibitions contained in s.37. The licensee submits that none of the statutory prohibitions apply in Mr Fourie's case and, accordingly, that it is necessary to satisfy the test under s.36(1)(c) that the licensee is a fit and proper person to hold a licence, notwithstanding the fact of the conviction. We do not think there is any useful point in addressing s.36 of the Act in this case which involves a simple consideration of s.73, which the prosecution have confined to s.73(d). [...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 28 Megan Jaffe Real Estate Ltd v Kelland [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...applicant (by virtue of s 51(2)). However, she claims that the agreement did not 3 Mr Smith, who is the Chief Executive of the Ray White Group in New Zealand, deposes that there are three classes of licence under the Real Estate Agents Act, one of which is agent (the other two are branch manager and salesperson). Ms Kelland was and continues to be registered under the Real Estate Agents Act as an agent. Section 6 of the Act provides...

6. Nair v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 49 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...temporary visa. [9] Only parts of the agreements have been supplied to the Tribunal. Mr Nair says the agreements were with Mr Standing and a company named Living New Zealand Ltd. Mr Standing was identified as a licensed immigration adviser, with his licence number. [10] It appears one agreement focused on immigration services, and the other for services related to seeking a position of employment. [11] Mr Nair was induced to enter into the agreements, in part, by representations fr...

7. Chand v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 25 (14 March 2014) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...provided information to support that claim, and it was her client’s choice to proceed on that basis. She says she acted appropriately given the information she held. [5] She claimed the unlicensed person only provided services that did not require a licence. [6] The Tribunal has found the adviser failed to give adequate advice and take proper instructions and that she was party to an unlicensed person providing immigration advice. The complaint [7] The Registrar filed a Statement of...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 22 - OT v Ramos (27 June 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...undertake further training at Toi Ohomai. She failed to have sufficient systems in place to ensure the application was lodged on time, as well as failed to produce and maintain updated documentation. [21] It is contended by Mr Foley that the licence of Ms Ramos should be suspended for at least six months. While a severe sanction, it may be used as a last resort. Ms Ramos has acted in a way that is likely to damage the reputation of the profession. The public should be protecte...

9. Greyling v Gimranov [2016] NZIACDT 22 (2 May 2016) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...[4.1] Mr Woodberg provided immigration services unlawfully, and Mr Gimranov allowed that to occur in breach of his professional obligations. The essential principle underlying that ground of complaint is that unless a person is exempt from holding a licence, or does hold a licence as a licensed immigration adviser, the law prohibits them from providing any immigration services. [4.2] Mr Gimranov was required to charge professional fees that were fair and reasonable; and when the complain...

10. [2024] NZREADT 20 CAC2108 v Leading Edge Properties Ltd (25 June 2024) [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...it thinks fit, make 1 or more of the orders specified in subsection (2). (2) The orders are as follows: (a) 1 or more of the orders that can be made by a Committee under section 93 (except under section 93(1)(ha)): (b) an order cancelling the licence of the licensee and, in the case of a licensee that is a company, also cancelling the licence of any officer of the company: (c) an order suspending the licence of the licensee for a period not exceeding 24 months and, in the case of a...