Search Results

1. Thomson - Omahu 4C4 Ahu Whenua Trust (2016) 48 Takitimu MB 249 (48 TKT 249) [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Cancel the reservation: (c) Redefine the purposes for which the reservation is made: (d) Redefine the persons or class of persons for whose use or benefit the reservation is made. (6) No notice under this section shall affect any lease or licence, but no land shall be set apart as a Maori reservation while it is subject to any mortgage or charge. (7) The Court may, by order, vest any Maori reservation in any body corporate or in any 2 or more persons in trust to hold and...

2. Baker v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Yu [2018] NZREADT 73 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...nothing in the Act which establishes the position in an agency, or sets out the functions and obligations of the person holding that position. [27] We were referred to s 36 of the Act which provides (as relevant to this appeal): 36 Entitlement to licence (1) An individual may be licensed as an agent or branch manager if the individual satisfies the Registrar that he or she– (a) has attained the age of 18 years; and (b) is not prohibited from holding a licence under s 37; and...

3. Te Paa - Ahipara A33 (2012) 47 Taitokerau MB 3 (47 TTK 3) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...then standard Taitokerau ahu whenua trust order. Two features of the trust order are relevant. First, clauses 3 and 4 set out the power to lease: 3 To make other special provisions for owners At their discretion to alienate by way of lease or licence to any beneficial owner at a reduced rent or otherwise upon terms more favourable to the lessee than those obtainable on the open market 47 Taitokerau MB 5 PROVIDED THAT the land is free of all mortgages and encumbrances. 4...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 27 - INZ v Tran (20 November 2024) [pdf, 230 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2024] NZIACDT 27 Reference No: IACDT 022/24 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (Sarah Watson) Complainant AND THAH TAM THOMAS TRAN Adviser Decision on the papers SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated

5. [2025] NZIACDT 12 - XI v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a truck driver’s offsider for a named cartage company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 24 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 8 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. He eventually found a few days...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 13 – HG v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a truck driver’s offsider for a named cartage company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 24 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 8 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8...

7. [2025] NZIACDT 18 – YI v Liu (27 February 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 18 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 4 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8] I...

8. [2025] NZIACDT 19 – DH v Liu (28 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 8 April 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 10 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8] I...

9. [2025] NZIACDT 16 – TX v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 10 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 21 March 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. He managed to arrange some work...

10. [2025] NZIACDT 15 – ZJ v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 10 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 21 March 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. He managed to arrange about two...