LCRO 124-2014 SM v TK [pdf, 236 KB]
...[82] That case involved an appeal against a decision of the Complaints Review Tribunal, which had held that a lawyer’s actions in retaining a client’s passport to secure payment of an outstanding account amounted to discrimination under the Human Rights Act 1993. The passport in contention was an Indian passport, and the property of the Indian Government. [83] As such, the Court was not called on to address the significance to the case of the New Zealand Passports Act 1992, but...