Otago Standards Committee v Rayner [2014] NZLCDT 62 [pdf, 87 KB]
...professional role, he could not divorce himself from being M’s barrister having just visited M in that capacity. That opened his actions up to the very type of allegations that eventuated. On the other hand we believe that it was an understandable human reaction, given the circumstances that the practitioner found his long-standing, respected client in, to carry out a simple, lawful request in the nature of a kindness. [58] The Tribunal finds that the practitioner did not breach r...