Search Results

1. [2020] NZSSAA 6 (28 April 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...a letter dated 19 August 2019, two years after the relevant period, written by a Dr Dietrich which states: This is to certify that my patient for over 20 years, (name and date of birth redacted) has been critically ill and that for medical and humane reasons, it was absolutely necessary for his only son, (the appellant), to be with his father at his bedside in Germany from 15 May 2017 to 30 September 2017. [25] We asked the appellant why this medical certificate was not issued to hi...

2. McLeod - Mangatawa 2B 2A Block (Tamapahore Marae) (2020) 201 Waikato Maniapoto MB 145 (201 WMN 145) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...(d) The Ngāti Kahu representative on the Te Mana Whenua o Tauranga forum; and (e) A former representative for both Ngāti Kāhu and Ngāti He during treaty settlement negotiations. Pine McLeod spoke also of completing a bachelor’s degree in Humanities from Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi Wānanga. He referred to acquiring theoretical skills from a kaupapa and tikanga Māori perspective, which he was applying to the various Māori governance roles he undertakes and in his da...

3. 220412 Detailed funding proposal template April 2022 [docx, 282 KB]

   ...proposal? Maximum 300 words. A risk is something that hasn’t happened yet but has some probability of occurring (add more rows if required). · List the key risks involved. Consider risks that relate to reputation, public confidence, deliverables, human resources, and finances. · Consider the consequence or impact of each risk – minimal impact to the programme and agency or severe political/reputational damage, employees are harmed, severe impact on service delivery. · Consider the like...

4. Proceeds of Crime Fund full proposal template [docx, 277 KB]

   ...proposal? Maximum 300 words. A risk is something that hasn’t happened yet but has some probability of occurring (add more rows if required). · List the key risks involved. Consider risks that relate to reputation, public confidence, deliverables, human resources, and finances. · Consider the consequence or impact of each risk – minimal impact to the programme and agency or severe political/reputational damage, employees are harmed, severe impact on service delivery. · Consider the like...

5. [2021] NZACC 108 – Wood v ACC (19 July 2021 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...the Corporation’s decision involved an error of law and that “the Corporation’s actions have exceeded their statutory powers in relation to clause 28 and its adherence to the Privacy Act, Health and Information Privacy Code, and ultimately Human Rights under their numerous iterations of law; e.g. Bill of Rights Act s 27”. [25] Mr Wood goes on to state: I believe it is of great importance and public interest for this application for leave of the District Court to appeal t...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 85 Wilson v Manukau Institute of Technology [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...asserting they were ill-founded. Initially, the challenge was opposed, but in the process of filing submissions for the purpose of the disclosure challenge, MIT provided further documents. MIT’s current position is laid out in an affidavit of its Human Resources Business Partnering Manager, Ms Carolyn Pene. [6] The issues which remain are whether further disclosure by MIT would give rise to a disproportionate burden, and whether the documents sought are in fact relevant. I a...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 074 Currie v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 385 KB]

   ...and weigh bridge receipts) that any further contaminated soil required to be removed and disposed offsite at a landfill facility consented to receive such material; b. The statement that "it is highly unlikely that there will be a risk to human health" to all i. future occupants, users and neighbouring occupants; c. An updated 'SLUR' site plan with polygons for each SLUR classification of soil and a i. specific legend describing each element on the plan; d. S...

8. LCRO 77/2021 GS and VU v CN and SW (23 March 2022) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...Lawyer (3rd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2016) at [4.3.2]. 10 Standards Committee determination, above n 1 at [17]. 8 • Mr VU needed to be careful he did not breach the requirements of rr 3.1 and 4.1.1, and the general requirements of the Human Rights Act 1993 not to discriminate against Mrs MM • Mr VU had obtained confirmation from Mrs MM’s doctor, that she was capable of engaging a lawyer for legal representation. This was supported by a report from a forensic psych...

9. F Ltd v DS & KS [2022] NZDT 173 (10 October 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...expenses incurred. When they reviewed all of the vet invoices, the total up to the end of Noah’s treatment was actually $3,892.23, a bit more than the amount they have counterclaimed. 16. DQ says that he simply agreed to pay the vet bills as a ‘human response’ to help out. He says there was no discussion about whether he would pay for future vet bills, although he was aware DS and KS may have to pay more vet costs. 17. DS and KS agree that there was no agreement about whethe...

10. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...in which personal information may be obtained or made available. (2) An action taken by an agency does not breach IPPs 1 to 5, 7 to 10, or 13 if the action is authorised or required by or under New Zealand law. [24] The law was applied by the Human Rights Review Tribunal (“HRRT”) in Hunia v Police.3 There it was determined by the HRRT that the Police’s use of the plaintiff’s personal information (in this case, a blood sample) was authorised or required by or under New Zea...