4128 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 3 Reference No. HRRT 004/2012 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANDREW RONALD MACMILLAN PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND PAROLE BOARD DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AR MacMillan in person Ms VJ Owen for Defendant DATE OF DECISION: 31 January 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT ST...
...the employees on the basis of joint employment. However, I would observe, that any lawyer acting for the Applicant’s clients, would have been provided with this information by the clients themselves, who included the former General Manager and Human Resources Manager. Consequently, the confidentiality of the information obtained by the Applicant in advising on the Q and A sheet may be more illusory than real. [46] The Respondent refers to the comments of Asher J in Hana New Zeala...
...disadvantaged by the application of s 70. [19] In this case it appears that the appellant is subject to differential treatment because she is married and she is married to a non-New Zealand resident. This amounts to discrimination under s 23 of the Human Rights Act 1993 and as such appears to be a breach of s 19 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990. [20] Section 6 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act provides that whenever any enactment can be given a meaning that is consistent with th...
...conclusion, we have given particular emphasis to the purpose of this legislation, and the need to create a workable drinking-water regime. Jeff Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel Stuart Beresford Principal Adviser Bill of Rights/Human Rights Team Footnotes 1 The Bill defines "designated officer" to include a person designated as a Medical Officer of Health, a Health Protection Officer, or as "an officer who has functions, duties, or powers under t...
...concerns. [33] Mr BG wants a retrial, to have his firearms licence back, and to be paid compensation by Mr TC for putting him in this position. He says he has taken other steps to try and recover his position, including laying a complaint to the Human Rights Commission alleging unlawful discrimination. [34] Other than his request for compensation, none of Mr BG’s concerns about the Police, the Crown or the Judge, or his requests for remedies, fall within the jurisdiction of thi...
...1 Tulloch v Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] NZERA Wellington 120. Background [3] Mr Tulloch is a Registered Electrician. Hays is a company that provides recruitment for the provision of human resources services. On 8 January 2015, Mr Tulloch responded to an advertisement placed by Hays for an electrician to work for a third party on a particular project. After being interviewed by a Hays consultant, Mr Tulloch signed an ind
...Rights Act. Section 22 – liberty of the person 28. Section 22 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily arrested or detained. The purpose of the right not to be arbitrarily detained is the protection of human dignity, autonomy and liberty.17 29. To trigger the concept of detention there must be a “substantial intrusion on personal liberty”,18 whether a physical deprivation or a statutory constraint. The Court of Appeal has held that:19...
...programmes to address economic and societal impacts. Our key priorities align with the goals of proposed changes to the justice system and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which stipulate that children have the same fundamental human rights to health and wellbeing as adults. Changes to the Justice System The RANZCP principles to guide ongoing redevelopment of the family justice system must recognise the importance of: meeting the contemporary need...
...overall, is the penalty which is fair, reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. DISCUSSION [27] Ms Proudman’s initial mistake was one of interpretation of the immigration instructions. While it could not be described as minor or simple human error, as the Tribunal pointed out in the substantive decision, Ms Proudman’s subsequent conduct has significantly exacerbated her wrongdoing.8 She concealed Immigration New Zealand’s decision from her client, falsely claimin...
...a letter dated 19 August 2019, two years after the relevant period, written by a Dr Dietrich which states: This is to certify that my patient for over 20 years, (name and date of birth redacted) has been critically ill and that for medical and humane reasons, it was absolutely necessary for his only son, (the appellant), to be with his father at his bedside in Germany from 15 May 2017 to 30 September 2017. [25] We asked the appellant why this medical certificate was not issued to hi...