4131 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 28 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 015/2017 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant CONT. AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Re...
...voting papers are returned multiple times) and dual votes (where a voter votes multiple times) to be excluded; only allowing electronic signatures using physical action, and not typed signatures; CAPTCHA tests to determine the user is human; and security testing, accreditation of systems, and encryption. Providing dictation voting for overseas voters who have a disability 8 Currently, dictation voting is only available for voters in New Zealand who are blind, vision im...
...that claim. Those documents included a statement of correction to the information the HDC had about Miss Lawson on its file. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Lawson v Health and Disability Commissioner (Strike-out) [2023] NZHRRT 15.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 15 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On 24 September 2019 Miss Lawson filed this claim with the Tribunal. She claims that, in dealing with the complaint referred to at [1] above, the HDC did n...
...withholding certain personal information from her in breach of Information Privacy Principle 6 (IPP6) of the PA93. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Morunga v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 28.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 28 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] In its statement of reply dated 20 July 2020; Corrections admitted that it had failed to respond to Ms Morunga’s request for personal information wi...
...case conferences under the Care of Children Act 2004. 12 Family Court Associates will not exercise jurisdiction over matters requiring significant judicial discretion. These matters will remain with judges due to their impact on people, impact on human rights or complexity: 12.1 without-notice (urgent) applications that involve immediate risk/harm; 12.2 hearings (defended and undefended); 12.3 orders and directions after a case has been classified as complex under the Care of Childr...
...written submissions were received on behalf of a large number of immediate families and other Interested Parties. Most, but not all, were represented by counsel. Having been granted status as an intervener in relation to the scope of the Inquiry, the Human Rights Commission (HRC) also filed written submissions. The extensive nature of the written submissions is testimony to the critical importance of this decision on scope. [32] The Scope Hearing was originally to be held in Christ...
...operative, the following being the most important: Objective 6 Water quality in each freshwater body, coastal lagoon and estuary will be: (a) maintained where the water quality is not degraded; and (b) improved where the water quality is degraded by human activities. 6 This is the version of s 32(4) RMA that applied at the date the plan was notified. 7 SRC Linkages document filed 4 October 2022. 8 Objective 13 Provided that: (a) the quantity, quality and structure o...
...Management 2014 (as amended in 2017) (c) the state on 7 September 2017 commencement date means the date on which this National Policy Statement comes into force compulsory value means the 4 values described in Appendix 1A, being: ecosystem health, human contact, mahinga kai, and threatened species degraded, in relation to an FMU or part of an FMU, means that as a result of something other than a naturally occurring process: (a) a site or sites in the FMU or part of the FMU to whic...
...PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF SERVICE USERS OTHER THAN PLAINTIFF (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 52 Reference No. HRRT 015/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant...
...aligns with the Government’s ongoing commitment to honour our Treaty obligations, in particular to protect Māori interests under Article Three. 31.2. the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) and the Human Rights Act 1993: 31.2.1. In line with standard practice, the Crown Law Office will be advising the Attorney-General on the Bill’s consistency with NZBORA. 31.2.2. I note the policy proposal around pre-recorded cross-examination has...