Search Results

1. Mateeva v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2024] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...six-month time period within which such proceedings must usually be commenced. 1 This decision is to be cited as Mateeva v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2024] NZHRRT 39. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 39 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 013/2024 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN VANYA DIMITROVA MATEEVA PLAINTIFF AND MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT...

2. Wider-stakeholders-feedback-summary.pdf [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...definitions apply to groups that are not intended to be captured (e.g. community groups, civil societies, charities, trade unions, indigenous groups, and arguably government officials); and 17.4. such broad definitions have significant implications for human rights under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 and our international human rights obligations. 18. One submitter commented that lobbyists should be official, paid employees if representing an organisation. 4 19. One subm...

3. Equal Pay Amendment Bill [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...have not yet been determined. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19 - Freedom from discrimination 5. Section 19( 1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Human Rights Act). Discrimination requires that:1 a. there is a differential treatment or effect as between persons or groups in analogous or comparable situations on the basis of a prohibited ground of discriminat...

4. Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...infrastructure projects.8 Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19 – Freedom from discrimination 7. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Human Rights Act). 8. Two factors must be met for discrimination to be identified under section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act:9 a. there is a differential treatment or effect as between persons or groups in an...

5. Updated advice on consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Citizenship (Western Samoa) (Restoration) Amendment Bill [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...criteria in a. or b. above. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19 – Freedom from discrimination 7. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Human Rights Act). 8. Two factors must be met for discrimination to be identified under section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act:4 a. there is a differential treatment or effect as between persons or groups in...

6. [2008] NZEmpC AC 11/08 Shakes & Anor v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...was assured of this, he approved the requested leave for both men. There is no suggestion of any party acting in bad faith in these interchanges. The plaintiffs attended and gave evidence at the Authority’s investigation meeting. [6] A NSTL human resources adviser subsequently considered that this was not an appropriate use of paid union leave. The company’s view was that employees absent from work to be witnesses in proceedings should take personal leave of some sort for t...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 204 Here v McAlphine Hussman Ltd [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...seriousness of the allegation, the possible consequences of an adverse finding, and of the right to representation. [16] Mr Here attended the meeting with his representative (Mr Campbell, who was the union delegate at the factory). Ms Van Es, the Human Resources Manager, was also present. Ms Van Es took notes, and assisted Mr Atkins in her capacity as human resources adviser. [17] Mr Here did not deny that he had uttered the words complained of, and nor did he (or his represent...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 126 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...contents of what was then this draft affidavit not only did not allay its concerns but exacerbated them. In particular, she says that at para 4(a) of Ms Park’s draft affidavit the intended deponent indicated that she had searched LSG’s hard copy human resources files and provided documents to its counsel for inclusion in the schedule of privileged documents. [10] Counsel for the plaintiff are critical that Ms Park did not depose to when those searches had occurred, and the lang...

9. BORA Sale of Liquor (Youth Alcohol Harm Reduction) Amendment Bill [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...commercial expression under section 14 of the Bill of Rights Act. SECTION 19: RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM DISCRIMINATION 16. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act provides the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993. These grounds include age, which means any age commencing with the age of 16 years. 17. In our view, taking into account the various domestic and overseas judicial pronouncements as to the meaning of discriminatio...

10. Evidence Brief: Mental Health Courts [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...Interventions with Mental Health Illness: Evaluation of Mental Health Courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York, Urban Institute. Honegger, L. (2015). Does the Evidence Support the Case for Mental Health Courts? A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behaviour, Vol. 39, No. 5. Citations i Thompson et al, 2007 ii Almquist and Dodd 2009 iii Schug and Fradella, 2015 iv Ibid. v Sowerwine and Schetzer, 2013 vi Sarteschi et al, 20...