Search Results

Search results for human.

4145 items matching your search terms

  1. Wernham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 022 [pdf, 315 KB]

    ...ortho-toludine, which is a potent bladder carcinogen. … … I consider it highly likely that Mr Wernham has been occupationally exposed to aromatic amines, specifically orthotoluidine and aniline. Ortho- toluidine is classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence in humans that ortho-toluidine causes cancer of the urinary bladder, 10 and sufficient evidence in experimental animals (IARC monograph 100F, 2012). Aniline is classified as a probable...

  2. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

    ...PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON REDACTED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 28/2021 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN DIJ PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms K Ander...

  3. Greensmith v Auckland Council [2025] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 372 KB]

    ...PLAINTIFF. (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON. REDACTED PUBLISHED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Greensmith v Auckland Council [2025] NZHRRT 24. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 24 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 038/2022 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN JANE HELEN GREENSMITH PLAINTIFF AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND...

  4. 2021-04-13 Transcript (up to end of day 15) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 12 April 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environme

  5. [2022] NZEnvC 266 Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 3 MB]

    pSWLP – AGREED PROVISIONS IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 266 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN ARATIATIA LIVESTOCK LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-29) (and all other appellants listed in the Schedule attached) AND SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Deputy Environment

  6. [2023] NZEnvC 204 Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

    9th Interim Decision – Aratiatia Livestock Limited & Ors v Southland Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 204 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN ARATIATIA LIVESTOCK LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-29) (and all other appellants listed in the Schedule attached) Appellants AND SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

  7. Directory of Official Information 2019 P-R [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...organisations within relevant statutory rules. • maintain mine infrastructure and manage ongoing mine safety while work on re-entry is undertaken • seal the mine and rehabilitate the site once work on re-entry is complete and no further human activity in the drift is required; the sealing of the mine will meet all relevant safety standards and would be a reversible seal (a seal that allows for the mine to be re-entered at a future date) Structure The Agency is headed by a chie...

  8. [2007] NZEmpC WC 14A/07 CE of the Department of Corrections v Tawhiwhirangi [pdf, 170 KB]

    ...generally whether the actions of an employer were fair and reasonable, relevant factors are the size of the workplace and the number of employees employed, the nature and quality of the resources available to the employer including access to specialist human resources advice, and any other statutory or public interest obligations on the employer. [12] In this case the following specific factors are relevant to the assessment of the department’s actions....

  9. [2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 497 KB]

    ...behalf and responses (which Ms Stormont largely regarded as inadequate) were provided. I return to this when considering the plaintiff’s argument that the redundancy process was procedurally flawed. [28] Ms Wood, director of Knowhow Ltd (a human resources consultancy), had been brought in by Peddle Thorp to assist it with the restructuring proposal. Ms Wood wrote to Ms Stormont’s lawyer on 6 November 2014 stating that the amount of bonus owing to her was $1,526.80. She made...

  10. BORA Immigration Bill [pdf, 480 KB]

    ...to be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act. ISSUES OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 24. The Bill has been drafted to ensure it is consistent with the Bill of Rights Act and New Zealand’s existing obligations under international human rights treaties, including the Refugee Convention, the Convention against Torture (CAT), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). 25. There are many features of the new immigration regime which positively refle...