Search Results

1. Russia Sanctions Bill [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...objective, and engages rights in ways that are minimally limiting and proportionate to the importance of the objective.2 1 Section 19 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993. Section 21 of the Human Rights Act lists the prohibited grounds of discrimination. These include “ethnic or national origin, which includes nationality or citizenship” (see s 21(g) Human Rights Act). 2 Hanse...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 40 Dumolo v Lakes District Health Board [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...Removal of organisational property without authorisation on 24 April 2010, i.e. unauthorised removal of Lakes District Health Board property/dishonesty. The meeting was attended by yourself; your representative, Dr Lloyd Lang; Hannes Schoeman, Human Resource Manager; and myself. As discussed at the meeting, regarding the first allegation, it was decided to give you the benefit of the doubt that the write protect on the back-up tape may have moved halfway to the “off position�...

3. Hide v Official Assignee (Confidentiality Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 302 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 1 Reference No. HRRT 035/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RODNEY PHILIP HIDE PLAINTIFF AND OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE DEFENDANT AT CHRISTCHURCH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RP Hide in person assisted by Mr DI Henderson as McKenzie friend Mr SM Kinsler and Ms SK Shaw for defendant Ms R Jam...

4. Kooiman v CAC519, Rodgers, Clarke and Cudby [2019] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...to award costs, in any proceedings under the Act. She referred us to the judgment of her Honour Justice Mallon in the High Court in Commissioner of Police v Andrews, in which her Honour set out principles applicable to awards of costs under the Human Rights Act 1993.15 [59] Mr Kooiman submitted that he is not a vexatious litigant, and has not instigated multiple proceedings. In response to Mr Dewar’s statements, he submitted that:...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...basis that there is a liquidation. Schedule 7, or any other provisions relating to a company placed in liquidation, do not currently apply. [57] Finally, Mr Chambers submitted that articles 1, 2, 4, 10 and 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (the Declaration) precluded the possibility of any jurisdiction being exercised under s 137 of the Act. The gist of the submission was that under these provisions the arbitrary deprivation of property would amount to a breach of...

6. Layton v Aon New Zealand Ltd [2018] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...file and, following a complaint to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC), a check carried out by Aon 1 [This decision is to be cited as Layton v Aon New Zealand Ltd [2018] NZHRRT 48] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 48 2 found a number of documents not included, which were then provided to Ms Layton. Ms Layton remains of the view that further documents have not been provided...

7. David Guccione Evidence in Chief [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...Reef (also known as Astrolabe Reef) and MNEA as defined_ in the planning Maps to be presented by Di Lucas. 4 For this statement of evidence I am defining a 'natural ecosystem' as one that functions as it did, without the influence of humans, other than for subsistence fishing by pre-European populations. It includes highly interconnected apex communities, with all size ranges, of all the naturally occurring species of flora and fauna present. 1 31 Bottom trawling...

8. Coroners-Doctors-Fees-Regulations-2022-Proactive-release.pdf [pdf, 995 KB]

   ...the qualifying criteria. 5 B U D G E T S E N S I T I V E 8z1p0sitx3 2022-06-22 14:29:26 Proa cti ve R ele as e B U D G E T S E N S I T I V E Population Implications 35 The proposals in this paper have no specific population implications. Human Rights 36 The proposals in this paper have no specific human rights implications. Consultation 37 The following agencies were consulted on this paper: the Ministry of Health, the Treasury, the Accident Compensation Corporation, New Zeal...

9. Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees [2024] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...Primary School (the School) for six years. In their final two years at the School Mr and Ms Cunliffe made several 1 This decision is to be cited as Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees [2024] NZHRRT 4. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 4 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 information privacy requests to the Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (the Board) following a complaint they had made to the Board. [2] The Boar...

10. McLennan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 54 [pdf, 254 KB]

    ...workers exposed to glutaraldehyde is limited to reports of increased incidences of self-reported headaches during disinfection processes in which glutaraldehyde was used. Glutaraldehyde-induced neurotoxiclty has not been demonstrated in either humans or animals. Numerous reports suggest that glutaraldehyde causes dermal sensitisation in occupational settings where glutaraldehyde is used as a germicide. The dermal sensitisation potential of glutaraldehyde has not been demonstra...